A.P.G.P. v. M.S.P.,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeMcDermot, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Citation2013 ONSC 6595,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 6595,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 6595 (SC)
Date25 October 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...5297; Hunt v Hunt, 2023 ONSC 5411; AF v MB, 2022 PESC 15; Pellegrini v Tkach, 2023 SKCA 85; KDFK v WALBS, 2024 YKSC 3. 186 APGP v MSP, 2013 ONSC 6595. Canadian Family Law 10e.indb 11/18/2024 10:54:17 AM Parenting Arrangements After Divorce 485 family member in a home setting, it is not a lo......
  • Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ..., 2012 MBQB 145; EAM v ADM , 2014 NBQB 216; Catizzone v Cowell , 2016 ONSC 5297; Guenther v Vanderhoof , 2014 SKQB 296. 137 APGP v MSP , 2013 ONSC 6595. 138 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Judge Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3d......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Sixth Edition
    • August 29, 2015
    ...ADM , 2014 NBQB 216; Price v Laflamme , 2012 MBQB 145; CRJ v DJ , 2013 ONSC 1280; Guenther v Vanderhoof , 2014 SKQB 296. 123 APGP v MSP , 2013 ONSC 6595. 124 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Judge Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...NBQB 216; T(KM) v P(JMP), 2018 NWTSC 16; Catizzone v Cowell, 2016 ONSC 5297; Heck (Meszaros) v Meszaros, 2020 SKQB 230. 173 APGP v MSP, 2013 ONSC 6595. 174 Stec v Blair, 2021 ONSC 6212 at para 175 Ascani v Keedi, 2021 ONSC 4282, citing Najjardizaji v Mehrjerdi, 2004 ONCJ 374 at para 23. Cha......
  • Get Started for Free
1 cases
  • McKinnon v. McKinnon
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 28, 2018
    ...Rules, O. Reg. 114/99. The same applies to draft minutes of settlement tendered on another party but not signed: Parreira v. Parreira, 2013 ONSC 6595. This rationale extends to a settlement that was agreed upon but could not be implemented. The trial judge here ought to have made his decisi......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 25 – 29)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 10, 2018
    ...Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, Evidence, Admissibility, Settlement Communications,Civil Contempt, Parreira v Parreira, 2013 ONSC 6595, Carey v Laiken, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 79, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Rule 18(8) Canadian Language Leadership Centre - CLLC Inc. v. 20 Eglinton Commer......
6 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...5297; Hunt v Hunt, 2023 ONSC 5411; AF v MB, 2022 PESC 15; Pellegrini v Tkach, 2023 SKCA 85; KDFK v WALBS, 2024 YKSC 3. 186 APGP v MSP, 2013 ONSC 6595. Canadian Family Law 10e.indb 11/18/2024 10:54:17 AM Parenting Arrangements After Divorce 485 family member in a home setting, it is not a lo......
  • Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ..., 2012 MBQB 145; EAM v ADM , 2014 NBQB 216; Catizzone v Cowell , 2016 ONSC 5297; Guenther v Vanderhoof , 2014 SKQB 296. 137 APGP v MSP , 2013 ONSC 6595. 138 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Judge Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3d......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Sixth Edition
    • August 29, 2015
    ...ADM , 2014 NBQB 216; Price v Laflamme , 2012 MBQB 145; CRJ v DJ , 2013 ONSC 1280; Guenther v Vanderhoof , 2014 SKQB 296. 123 APGP v MSP , 2013 ONSC 6595. 124 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Judge Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3......
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...NBQB 216; T(KM) v P(JMP), 2018 NWTSC 16; Catizzone v Cowell, 2016 ONSC 5297; Heck (Meszaros) v Meszaros, 2020 SKQB 230. 173 APGP v MSP, 2013 ONSC 6595. 174 Stec v Blair, 2021 ONSC 6212 at para 175 Ascani v Keedi, 2021 ONSC 4282, citing Najjardizaji v Mehrjerdi, 2004 ONCJ 374 at para 23. Cha......
  • Get Started for Free