Palamarek, Re, 2011 BCSC 563

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHarris, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterGUARDIAN AND WARD,PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND
Citation2011 BCSC 563,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 563 (SC),[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 563
Date03 May 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 practice notes
  • Stewart v. Stewart, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2321
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2014
    ...have identified various considerations; see for example: Vranic (Re) , 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re) , 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re) , 2011 BCSC 563; Re Matthews , 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re) , 2013 BCSC 1965. They include: (a) whether the appointment reflects the patient's wishes, obviou......
  • Cho (Re), 2020 BCSC 689
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 23, 2020
    ...cases have identified various considerations; see for example: Vranic (Re), 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re), 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re), 2011 BCSC 563; Re Matthews, 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re), 2013 BCSC 1965. They include: (a) whether the appointment reflects the patient’s wishes, obvio......
  • Novo (Re), 2018 BCSC 1345
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 23, 2018
    ...and considered various factors that guide the analysis; see: Vranic (Re), 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re), 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re), 2011 BCSC 563; Matthews (Re), 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re), 2013 BCSC 1965. The factors that may or may not be applicable and the weight to be given to an......
  • Mok v. Wong,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 5, 2022
    ...cases have identified various considerations; see for example: Vranic (Re), 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re), 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re), 2011 BCSC 563; Re Matthews, 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re), 2013 BCSC 1965. They (a)  whether the appointment reflects the patient’s wishes, o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
  • Stewart v. Stewart, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2321
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2014
    ...have identified various considerations; see for example: Vranic (Re) , 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re) , 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re) , 2011 BCSC 563; Re Matthews , 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re) , 2013 BCSC 1965. They include: (a) whether the appointment reflects the patient's wishes, obviou......
  • Cho (Re), 2020 BCSC 689
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 23, 2020
    ...cases have identified various considerations; see for example: Vranic (Re), 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re), 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re), 2011 BCSC 563; Re Matthews, 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re), 2013 BCSC 1965. They include: (a) whether the appointment reflects the patient’s wishes, obvio......
  • Novo (Re), 2018 BCSC 1345
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 23, 2018
    ...and considered various factors that guide the analysis; see: Vranic (Re), 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re), 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re), 2011 BCSC 563; Matthews (Re), 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re), 2013 BCSC 1965. The factors that may or may not be applicable and the weight to be given to an......
  • Klop (Re),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 8, 2021
    ...cases have identified various considerations; see for example: Vranic (Re), 2007 BCSC 1949; Bowman (Re), 2009 BCSC 523; Palamarek (Re), 2011 BCSC 563; Re Matthews, 2013 BCSC 1045; and Sangha (Re), 2013 BCSC 1965. They (a) whether the appointment reflects the patient’s wishes, obviously when......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT