Panghali Estate v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgePunnett, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGES,PRACTICE,DAMAGE AWARDS
Date15 April 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • 1499925 Alberta Ltd. v NB Developments Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 27, 2023
    ...Manufacturing) v Denis Grigoras Law Office, 2018 ONCA 396 at para 6; Barbe v Evans, 2021 ABQB 796 at para 21; Panghali v Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647 at para 9; 742190 Ontario Inc (Van Del Manor Nursing Homes) v Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 162 at para 30; BNP Paribas Bank (Cana......
  • Smithies Holdings Inc. v. RCV Holdings Ltd., 2018 BCSC 1831
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 23, 2018
    ...the circumstances giving rise to the cause of action” … … 48. There must not be a double penalty however. In Panghali [Estate v Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647], Mr. Justice Punnett noted that, where the conduct giving rise to the litigation has already been punished through an award of punitive da......
  • 2023 BCSC 451,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...259, 1997 CanLII 4072 (C.A.). 251 The usual heads of damage in a claim under the Family Compensation Act are: See Panghali v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647 at para. 1) loss of financial support (or loss of dependency); 2) loss of household services and child care; 3) loss of guidance, care and co......
  • Ghaly v. Mand,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 24, 2023
    ...loss of inheritance; 5)    management fees; 6)    tax Gross-up. See Panghali v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647 at [252]    Under the Family Compensation Act, there is no compensable claim for loss of love, care, and/or companionship: Roberts at para.&#x......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • 1499925 Alberta Ltd. v NB Developments Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 27, 2023
    ...Manufacturing) v Denis Grigoras Law Office, 2018 ONCA 396 at para 6; Barbe v Evans, 2021 ABQB 796 at para 21; Panghali v Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647 at para 9; 742190 Ontario Inc (Van Del Manor Nursing Homes) v Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 162 at para 30; BNP Paribas Bank (Cana......
  • Smithies Holdings Inc. v. RCV Holdings Ltd., 2018 BCSC 1831
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 23, 2018
    ...the circumstances giving rise to the cause of action” … … 48. There must not be a double penalty however. In Panghali [Estate v Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647], Mr. Justice Punnett noted that, where the conduct giving rise to the litigation has already been punished through an award of punitive da......
  • 2023 BCSC 451,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...259, 1997 CanLII 4072 (C.A.). 251 The usual heads of damage in a claim under the Family Compensation Act are: See Panghali v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647 at para. 1) loss of financial support (or loss of dependency); 2) loss of household services and child care; 3) loss of guidance, care and co......
  • Ghaly v. Mand,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 24, 2023
    ...loss of inheritance; 5)    management fees; 6)    tax Gross-up. See Panghali v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647 at [252]    Under the Family Compensation Act, there is no compensable claim for loss of love, care, and/or companionship: Roberts at para.&#x......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • An Economic Analysis Of Damages In Fatal Accident Claims
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 31, 2016
    ...somewhat novel in Ontario, awards have been made for this head of damages in jurisdictions outside of Ontario. In Panghali v. Panghali, 2014 BCSC 647 (CanLII), the plaintiffs claimed that they had lost a potential inheritance as a consequence of the deceased's premature death, on the basis ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT