Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeMilman
Citation2022 BCSC 322
Date02 March 2022
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS205652
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • 2024 BCSC 480,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2024
    ...as the Plaintiffs' certification application: Dussiaume v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2023 BCSC 795 and Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322. Indeed, there is considerable logic in doing so given that Gilead takes the position that the Plaintiffs' proposed class proceeding does not ......
  • 2023 BCSC 795,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...BCSC 834 at para. 56, citing Canada (Attorney General) v. Lameman, 2008 SCC 14 at paras. 11 and 19; Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322 at para. 95 Given the uncontroverted evidence that neither ranitidine nor NDMA are reliably associated with increased cancer risk, and the ......
  • I.F. v Gilead Sciences, Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 22 Marzo 2024
    ...as the Plaintiffs' certification application: Dussiaume v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2023 BCSC 795 and Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322. Indeed, there is considerable logic in doing so given that Gilead takes the position that the Plaintiffs' proposed class proceeding does not ......
  • Dussiaume v Sandoz Canada Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 11 Mayo 2023
    ...BCSC 834 at para. 56, citing Canada (Attorney General) v. Lameman, 2008 SCC 14 at paras. 11 and 19; Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322 at para. 95 Given the uncontroverted evidence that neither ranitidine nor NDMA are reliably associated with increased cancer risk, and the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 795,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...BCSC 834 at para. 56, citing Canada (Attorney General) v. Lameman, 2008 SCC 14 at paras. 11 and 19; Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322 at para. 95 Given the uncontroverted evidence that neither ranitidine nor NDMA are reliably associated with increased cancer risk, and the ......
  • Dussiaume v Sandoz Canada Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 11 Mayo 2023
    ...BCSC 834 at para. 56, citing Canada (Attorney General) v. Lameman, 2008 SCC 14 at paras. 11 and 19; Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322 at para. 95 Given the uncontroverted evidence that neither ranitidine nor NDMA are reliably associated with increased cancer risk, and the ......
  • 2023 BCSC 2,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...1996 CanLII 871 (Ont. C.A.); Yahey v. British Columbia, 2021 BCSC 1287 at paras. 826–828; Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322 at paras. 74–84. The requirements of the public documents exception are consistent with the principled analysis of the hearsay rule out......
  • Burko v Martindale,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 Enero 2023
    ...1996 CanLII 871 (Ont. C.A.); Yahey v. British Columbia, 2021 BCSC 1287 at paras. 826–828; Pantusa v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2022 BCSC 322 at paras. 74–84. The requirements of the public documents exception are consistent with the principled analysis of the hearsay rule out......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT