Park v. Koepke et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1806
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1806,2013 BCSC 1806,[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1806 (SC Reg.) |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 01 October 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Tomas v. Mackie et al., 2015 BCSC 364
...[47] The expenses associated with filing Part 7 Writs have also been allowed in the Reed v. Amell , 2014 BCSC 1613; Park v. Koepke , 2013 BCSC 1806; and Hazbawi v. Lucier , 2001 BCSC 844. [48] The expenses associated with filing a Part 7 Writ have been disallowed in Dakin v. Roth, 2013 BCSC......
-
Neustaeter v. Woroniuk,
...Defence counsel referred to Antulov v. Emery, 2018 BCSC 898, Dakin v Roth, 2013 BCSC 1019 and Park v Koepke, 2013 BCSC 1806. All three cases provide helpful commentary on the approach to be taken regarding this type of disbursement. Absent clear evidence that photocopy charges do not includ......
-
Neustaeter v. ICBC, 2020 BCSC 208
...given the difficulties that the plaintiff had already experienced in accessing Part 7 benefits. Counsel referred me to Park v. Koepke, 2013 BCSC 1806, where Registrar Sainty states at paras. 12-13: [12] Here, Mr. Stewart advi......
-
Alvaro v. InsureBC (Lee & Porter) Insurance Services Inc., 2020 BCSC 153
...$360.25 for binding and office supplies costs, items that have been considered unrecoverable office overhead expenses in Park v. Koepke, 2013 BCSC 1806 (Registrar) at para. 46. I will therefore treat that item as unrecoverable. [36] The plaintiffs also cl......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Tomas v. Mackie et al., 2015 BCSC 364
...[47] The expenses associated with filing Part 7 Writs have also been allowed in the Reed v. Amell , 2014 BCSC 1613; Park v. Koepke , 2013 BCSC 1806; and Hazbawi v. Lucier , 2001 BCSC 844. [48] The expenses associated with filing a Part 7 Writ have been disallowed in Dakin v. Roth, 2013 BCSC......
-
Neustaeter v. Woroniuk,
...Defence counsel referred to Antulov v. Emery, 2018 BCSC 898, Dakin v Roth, 2013 BCSC 1019 and Park v Koepke, 2013 BCSC 1806. All three cases provide helpful commentary on the approach to be taken regarding this type of disbursement. Absent clear evidence that photocopy charges do not includ......
-
Neustaeter v. ICBC, 2020 BCSC 208
...given the difficulties that the plaintiff had already experienced in accessing Part 7 benefits. Counsel referred me to Park v. Koepke, 2013 BCSC 1806, where Registrar Sainty states at paras. 12-13: [12] Here, Mr. Stewart advi......
-
Alvaro v. InsureBC (Lee & Porter) Insurance Services Inc., 2020 BCSC 153
...$360.25 for binding and office supplies costs, items that have been considered unrecoverable office overhead expenses in Park v. Koepke, 2013 BCSC 1806 (Registrar) at para. 46. I will therefore treat that item as unrecoverable. [36] The plaintiffs also cl......
Request a trial to view additional results