Parliament, Cabinet, Democracy and Responsible Government

AuthorCraig Forcese/Aaron Freeman
Pages352-409
Parliament,
Cabinet,
Democracy
and
Responsible
Government
As
discussed
in
chapter
2,
"responsible" government
is the
means
by
which
the
executive
is
held structurally accountable
to the
legislature.
In
practice,
responsible government hinges
on two
concepts:
first,
the
min-
istry
is
usually expected
to
exert "command
and
control" authority
over
unelected
officials.
In the
words
of
Governor
General
Earl
Grey:
"[A]ll
hold-
ers of
permanent
offices
must
be
subordinate
to
some minister responsi-
ble
to
parliament."1
Thus,
as
discussed
at
various points
in
this book,
the
Governor
General generally acts only
on the
advice
of the
prime minister
or
Cabinet. Meanwhile,
as is
explored
in
greater detail
below,
departments
and
agencies
of the
public administration
of
Canada report
to
ministers.
Second,
these
same ministers
are
accountable
to
Parliament, both individ-
ually
and
collectively
as
members
of
Cabinet.
In
this fashion, parliamentar-
ians have ultimate responsibility
for the
governance
of the
country,
through
the
proxy
of
ministers.
In
this chapter,
we
explore both
of
these
aspects
of
responsible government.
We
begin
by
examining Cabinet's role
in
executive governance.
We
then highlight Parliament's function
in
over-
seeing that executive.
i
Cited
in
Donald
Savoie,
Breaking
the
Bargain
(Toronto:
University
of
Toronto
Press,
2003)
at 32.
352
6
Parliament, Cabinet, Democracy
and
Responsible Government
A.
CABINETS
ROLE
IN
EXECUTIVE
GOVERNANCE
Cabinet plays
a
central
role
in
Canadian governance,
exercising
hierarchical
and
structural
control
over
the
public
administration
of
Canada.
Canadian
law
includes
potent
measures
ensuring
that
this
public
administration
remains
accountable
to
Cabinet.
i.
Cabinet Procedure
and
Structure
a)
Cabinet
Purpose
and
Organization
In
the
words
of the
Privy
Council
Office,
Cabinet's
functions
include:
securing agreement among Ministers
on
government priorities; securing
agreement
on
parliamentary actions
by the
government; providing
a
forum
for
ministerial debate
on
issues
of
general interest; providing ade-
quate information
to
Ministers relative
to
decisions
for
which they will
be
held collectively responsible
and
which
may
impact
on
their individual
responsibilities;
and
providing adequate information
to the
Prime Minis-
ter
to
carry
out
his/her
responsibilities
and
his/her
leadership
role.2
Exactly
how
Cabinet
is
structured
to do all of
this,
and how it
proceeds,
is
mostly
the
domain
of
administration
and
politics,
not
law.
Prime
minis-
ters
are
entitled
to
organize
their
Cabinets
mostly
as
they wish,
using
any
number
of
different
committee
structures
and
delegating
various
degrees
of
decision-making autonomy
to
these
committees.3
As
Professor Donald
Savoie
has
detailed,
these
structures
and the way in
which
Cabinet deci-
sions
are
made,
reflect
the
personalities
and
priorities
of
individual
prime
ministers.4
At the
time
of
this
writing,
the
Martin Cabinet employs
eight
committees,
as
detailed
in
Table
6.i.5
Table
6.1
Cabinet Committees
in the
Martin Government
Com
m
ittee
Responsibility
Operations
Provides
the
day-to-day
coordination
of the
implementation
of the
gov-
ernment's
agenda,
including policy, House planning, urgent
issues
and
communications.
Treasury
Board
Manages
the
government's financial, personnel
and
administrative respon-
sibilities,
as
well
as
approving regulations
and
most
Orders-in-Council.
Privy
Council
Office, Information Resources:
About
Cabinet.
See
discussion
in
Donald
Savoie,
Governing
from
the
Centre
(Toronto: University
of
Toronto Press,
1999)
at
265.
Ibid.
Privy
Council
Office, Cabinet Committee Mandates
and
Membership.
353
2
3
4
5
354
THE
LAWS
OF
GOVERNMENT
Committee
Responsibility
Treasury
Board
Expenditure
Review
Sub-Committee
of the
Treasury
Board
Domestic Affairs
Global
Affairs
Security,
Public Health
&
Emergencies
Canada-U.S.
Aboriginal
Affairs
Note that
the
Financial Administration
Act
legislates some
of
Trea-
sury
Board's
responsibilities,
and
thus
the
prime minister does
not
set
all of
this committee's
mandate.6
Ministers
in
this committee
are
appointed
by
Order-in-Council
issued
pursuant
to the
Act.7
Reviews
all
programs
and
areas
of
cross-cutting
interest
and
makes
recommendations
to
Treasury
Board
on
funding
decisions
and re-
allocations.
Considers,
in an
integrated manner, social, economic
and
environ-
mental policy
issues.
Ensures
an
integrated approach
to
foreign
affairs, defence, interna-
tional development, international trade
and
other related
issues.
Manages
national security
and
intelligence
issues
and
activities,
and
ensures
coordination
of the
federal
response
to all
emergen-
cies,
including
natural disasters, public health,
and
security.
Ensures
an
integrated, government-wide approach
to
Canada-U.S.
relations.
Supports
a
renewed emphasis
on
Aboriginal
issues.
b)
Cabinet Solidarity
and
Confidence
Cabinet's
operations
are not
entirely
the
whim
of the
prime
minister.
At
least
one
principle
is
enduring:
ministers
in
Cabinet must
act in
solidarity.
Indeed,
this
Cabinet solidarity
has
been described
as an
unwritten consti-
tutional
convention.8
It
"allows ministers
to be
frank
in
private
but
requires
them
to
support
the
government
in
public."9
Thus,
a
minister must loyally
support
and
defend
any
Cabinet
decision,
and not
suggest
that
he or she
differed
with
the
prevailing
view.10
Further, ministers "may speak about government's policy only
after
it
has
been agreed
to in
private
by
their
colleagues."11
A
minister
may not
publicly
initiate
new
policy, absent this prior Cabinet consent.
For
this
same
reason,
a
minister
must
not
make public
statements
or
speeches
that
appear
to
implicate
the
government.12
To
these attributes
is
added
the
6
Financial
Administration
Act,
s. 5 et
seq.
7
See, e.g.,
Order-in-Council,
2004-0848
(2004-07-20).
8
See, e.g.,
Privy
Council
Office, Governing Responsibly:
A
Guide
for
Ministers
and
Minis-
ters
of
State
(2004).
9
Privy
Council
Office, Information Resources:
About
Cabinet.
10
Eugene
A.
Forsey
and
G.C.
Eglington,
The
Question
of
Confidence
in
Responsibk
Gov-
ernment
(Ottawa:
Special Committee
on the
Reform
of the
House
of
Commons,
1985)
at
84.
11
Privy
Council
Office, Information Resources:
About
Cabinet.
12
Forsey
and
Eglington,
The
Question
of
Confidence
at 84.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT