Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice D. MacDonald
Citation2020 BCSC 1625
Date30 October 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS1911847
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • 2023 BCSC 1016,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...in M. Taggart, ed., The Province of Administrative Law (1997), 279, at p. 286. [44] In Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625 at para. 15 our Court of Appeal confirmed, the “reasons first” approach in Vavilov applies in the context of a patently unreas......
  • Partridge v Aquaterra Management Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 13, 2023
    ...in M. Taggart, ed., The Province of Administrative Law (1997), 279, at p. 286. [44] In Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625 at para. 15 our Court of Appeal confirmed, the “reasons first” approach in Vavilov applies in the context of a patently unreas......
  • McNeil v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 29, 2023
    ...warrant further consideration and are summarily dismissed: UBC v. Chan, 2013 BCSC 942, para. 67; Parmar v. TransLink Security Management, 2020 BCSC 1625, para. 57; Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal v. Hill, 2011 BCCA 49, para. [30]       Section 27.5 a......
  • Flynn v. Pemberton Holmes Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 11, 2021
    ...administrative tribunals and to do so from a posture of restraint: Vavilov para. 84; Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625 at para. 15. As held in Parmar, this approach applies to judicial review on the patently unreasonable standard as well as a reasonableness sta......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 1016,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...in M. Taggart, ed., The Province of Administrative Law (1997), 279, at p. 286. [44] In Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625 at para. 15 our Court of Appeal confirmed, the “reasons first” approach in Vavilov applies in the context of a patently unreas......
  • Partridge v Aquaterra Management Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 13, 2023
    ...in M. Taggart, ed., The Province of Administrative Law (1997), 279, at p. 286. [44] In Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625 at para. 15 our Court of Appeal confirmed, the “reasons first” approach in Vavilov applies in the context of a patently unreas......
  • McNeil v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 29, 2023
    ...warrant further consideration and are summarily dismissed: UBC v. Chan, 2013 BCSC 942, para. 67; Parmar v. TransLink Security Management, 2020 BCSC 1625, para. 57; Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal v. Hill, 2011 BCCA 49, para. [30]       Section 27.5 a......
  • Flynn v. Pemberton Holmes Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 11, 2021
    ...administrative tribunals and to do so from a posture of restraint: Vavilov para. 84; Parmar v. Translink Security Management Limited, 2020 BCSC 1625 at para. 15. As held in Parmar, this approach applies to judicial review on the patently unreasonable standard as well as a reasonableness sta......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT