Pascal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 751
Date09 July 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 practice notes
  • Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1454
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 31, 2023
    ...determinations and reasoning are reasonable: Vavilov, at paras 125–126; Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751 at para VII. Analysis A. Applicable principles [20] Paragraph 40(1)(a) applies when it is demonstrated that the permanent resident or foreign national in......
  • Danaj v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2024 FC 402
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 8, 2024
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (F.C.A.), 2005 FCA 85 [2005] 3 FCR 487 and Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751 at para 13). [43] Similarly, the term organization must be interpreted broadly, some characteristics of an organization must be found such a......
  • Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Korasak,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 12, 2021
    ...determinations and reasoning are reasonable: Vavilov, above, at paras 125–126; Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751 at para 7 [Pascal]. VII. A. Did the IAD unreasonably conclude that Ms. Korasak had not been a member of the Organization and that she had not enga......
  • Cugliari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 263
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 23, 2023
    ...upon which the ID could rely. [29] The Applicant distinguishes the case at bar from Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751 [Pascal], where a police report was upheld as being proper factual evidence for the purposes of section 33. In Pascal, the ID specifically concluded......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1454
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 31, 2023
    ...determinations and reasoning are reasonable: Vavilov, at paras 125–126; Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751 at para VII. Analysis A. Applicable principles [20] Paragraph 40(1)(a) applies when it is demonstrated that the permanent resident or foreign national in......
  • Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Korasak,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 12, 2021
    ...determinations and reasoning are reasonable: Vavilov, above, at paras 125–126; Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751 at para 7 [Pascal]. VII. A. Did the IAD unreasonably conclude that Ms. Korasak had not been a member of the Organization and that she had not enga......
  • Cugliari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 263
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 23, 2023
    ...upon which the ID could rely. [29] The Applicant distinguishes the case at bar from Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751 [Pascal], where a police report was upheld as being proper factual evidence for the purposes of section 33. In Pascal, the ID specifically concluded......
  • Sidhu v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2023 FC 1681
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 14, 2023
    ...determinations and reasoning are reasonable: Vavilov, at paras 125–126; Pascal v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 751, at para 7. VI. Assessment of the Officer’s A. Did the Officer make a procedurally unfair Decision, by relying on extrinsic evidence? [26] Mr. Sid......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT