Patel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 FC 483 |
| Citation | 2021 FC 483 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 25 May 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Farboodi Langaroodi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1280
...to put their best case forward, which the Officer reasonably determined they did not (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483 at para 30, citing Sangha v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 95 at paras 42 and 47, Chamma v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 201......
-
Shidfar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1241
...the IRPR and the International Mobility Program. Applying Singh and Zargar, and in light of Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483 at para 40, I conclude that the Officer was not obligated to put their concerns to the Applicant before making their final determination. [19......
-
Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 671
...to the record before the decision-maker. However, there are exceptions to this general rule (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483, citing Access Copyright): [20] … (i) an affidavit that provides general background in circumstances where that information might ass......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1036
...required on an application for a temporary work permit are on the low end of the spectrum: Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483 at para 40. It is not required that applicants for temporary work permits be granted an opportunity to address an officer’s concern on ......
4 cases
-
Farboodi Langaroodi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1280
...to put their best case forward, which the Officer reasonably determined they did not (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483 at para 30, citing Sangha v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 95 at paras 42 and 47, Chamma v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 201......
-
Shidfar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1241
...the IRPR and the International Mobility Program. Applying Singh and Zargar, and in light of Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483 at para 40, I conclude that the Officer was not obligated to put their concerns to the Applicant before making their final determination. [19......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1036
...required on an application for a temporary work permit are on the low end of the spectrum: Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483 at para 40. It is not required that applicants for temporary work permits be granted an opportunity to address an officer’s concern on ......
-
Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 671
...to the record before the decision-maker. However, there are exceptions to this general rule (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 483, citing Access Copyright): [20] … (i) an affidavit that provides general background in circumstances where that information might ass......