Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc., 2020 ABCA 385
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 385 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0127AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 29 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Rahmani v 959630 Alberta Ltd.,
...and Standard of Review [14] The legal principles governing r 4.33 applications were recently summarized in Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at paras Several legal principles can be discerned from decisions of this Court interpreting r 4.33: The rule must be applied within the conte......
-
Stylecraft Developments (1984) Ltd v Carscallen LLP,
...it useful to the Defendant and thus did not “move the action forward in an essential way” ( Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at para 7 [ Patil]; Rahmani v 959630 Alberta Ltd, 2021 ABCA 110 at para 14 [ Rahmani]). Finally, the parties failed to meet any of the agreed u......
-
Vasiljevic v Kotur,
...essential way, having regard to the nature, quality, genuineness and timing of the advancing action”: Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at para V. Findings: The Plaintiff Vasiljevic A. Dismissal for Inordinate Delay (Rule 4.31) 1. Introduction 26 In my view, the defendants ha......
-
Takacs v International Union of Operating Engineers,
...had been waived. 16 The Court of Appeal helpfully summarized the principles for application of Rule 4.33 in Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at paras 7 & 8: [7] Several legal principles can be discerned from decisions of this Court interpreting r 4.33: • The rule must be......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Rahmani v 959630 Alberta Ltd.,
...and Standard of Review [14] The legal principles governing r 4.33 applications were recently summarized in Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at paras Several legal principles can be discerned from decisions of this Court interpreting r 4.33: The rule must be applied within the conte......
-
Stylecraft Developments (1984) Ltd v Carscallen LLP,
...it useful to the Defendant and thus did not “move the action forward in an essential way” ( Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at para 7 [ Patil]; Rahmani v 959630 Alberta Ltd, 2021 ABCA 110 at para 14 [ Rahmani]). Finally, the parties failed to meet any of the agreed u......
-
Vasiljevic v Kotur,
...essential way, having regard to the nature, quality, genuineness and timing of the advancing action”: Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at para V. Findings: The Plaintiff Vasiljevic A. Dismissal for Inordinate Delay (Rule 4.31) 1. Introduction 26 In my view, the defendants ha......
-
Pilon v Lavoie,
...and to the extent that, in the opinion of the Court, warrants the action continuing. 9 The Court of Appeal in Patil v Cenovus Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 385 at paras 7-8 and in Rahmani v 959630 Alberta Ltd, 2021 ABCA 110 at para 14 summarized the legal principles engaged in applications made und......
Request a trial to view additional results