Pattison (Jim) Enterprises et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeC.L. Smith, J.
Citation2009 BCSC 88,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88 (SC),[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88
Date02 February 2009
Subject MatterCONSTITUTIONAL LAW,COURTS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Pattison (Jim) Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), 2011 BCCA 35
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 2, 2011
    ...the impugned provisions were valid and enforceable: Jim Pattison Enterprises v. Workers' Compensation Board , [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88; 2009 BCSC 88. [4] The appellants raise a number of grounds of appeal. They contend the trial judge erred in finding that the impugned provisions are intra ......
  • 9171-7702 Quebec Inc. v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 4, 2013
    ...( R v Mersey Seafoods Ltd , 2008 NSCA 67, 295 DLR (4th) 244; Jim Pattison Enterprises v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2009 BCSC 88, 93 BCLR (4th) 131), the same must be true, a fortiori , of provisions on the sale of a vessel that are even further removed from navigation ......
2 cases
  • Pattison (Jim) Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 2, 2011
    ...the impugned provisions were valid and enforceable: Jim Pattison Enterprises v. Workers' Compensation Board , [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88; 2009 BCSC 88. [4] The appellants raise a number of grounds of appeal. They contend the trial judge erred in finding that the impugned provisions are intra ......
  • 9171-7702 Quebec Inc. v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 4, 2013
    ...( R v Mersey Seafoods Ltd , 2008 NSCA 67, 295 DLR (4th) 244; Jim Pattison Enterprises v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2009 BCSC 88, 93 BCLR (4th) 131), the same must be true, a fortiori , of provisions on the sale of a vessel that are even further removed from navigation ......