Pattison (Jim) Enterprises et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | C.L. Smith, J. |
| Citation | 2009 BCSC 88,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88 (SC),[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88 |
| Date | 02 February 2009 |
| Subject Matter | CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,COURTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Pattison (Jim) Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), 2011 BCCA 35
...the impugned provisions were valid and enforceable: Jim Pattison Enterprises v. Workers' Compensation Board , [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88; 2009 BCSC 88. [4] The appellants raise a number of grounds of appeal. They contend the trial judge erred in finding that the impugned provisions are intra ......
-
9171-7702 Quebec Inc. v. Canada
...( R v Mersey Seafoods Ltd , 2008 NSCA 67, 295 DLR (4th) 244; Jim Pattison Enterprises v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2009 BCSC 88, 93 BCLR (4th) 131), the same must be true, a fortiori , of provisions on the sale of a vessel that are even further removed from navigation ......
2 cases
-
Pattison (Jim) Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.)
...the impugned provisions were valid and enforceable: Jim Pattison Enterprises v. Workers' Compensation Board , [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 88; 2009 BCSC 88. [4] The appellants raise a number of grounds of appeal. They contend the trial judge erred in finding that the impugned provisions are intra ......
-
9171-7702 Quebec Inc. v. Canada
...( R v Mersey Seafoods Ltd , 2008 NSCA 67, 295 DLR (4th) 244; Jim Pattison Enterprises v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) , 2009 BCSC 88, 93 BCLR (4th) 131), the same must be true, a fortiori , of provisions on the sale of a vessel that are even further removed from navigation ......