Pava v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2019 FC 1239
Date26 September 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Burai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 966
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2020
    ...results in terms of state protection. [42] More generally, and contrary to the situation in Pavar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239, the Decision addresses the evidence demonstrating that the police are responsive and effective when actually called upon to investigate or ......
  • Mekhashishvili v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 65
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 19, 2021
    ...person did not try to obtain it because of a well-founded fear that it would not be provided (Pava v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239 at para 37). [33]  Here, the RAD accurately summarized the principles of state protection, including the fact that mere efforts of pro......
  • Kotai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 233
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 11, 2020
    ...efforts without examining the operational effectiveness of the police response: Pava v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239 at para 48 (emphasis added). The fact that alternate institutions exist does not constitute state protection, even if these institutions are ......
  • Gray v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 12, 2020
    ...of any. The general jurisprudence supports the Board’s conclusions (see, for instance, Pava v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239 at para 25). (ii) Risk as under section [16] The Board found nothing to suggest any concerns under a forward-looking risk. The Applicant was not a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Burai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 966
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2020
    ...results in terms of state protection. [42] More generally, and contrary to the situation in Pavar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239, the Decision addresses the evidence demonstrating that the police are responsive and effective when actually called upon to investigate or ......
  • Mekhashishvili v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 65
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 19, 2021
    ...person did not try to obtain it because of a well-founded fear that it would not be provided (Pava v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239 at para 37). [33]  Here, the RAD accurately summarized the principles of state protection, including the fact that mere efforts of pro......
  • Kotai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 233
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 11, 2020
    ...efforts without examining the operational effectiveness of the police response: Pava v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239 at para 48 (emphasis added). The fact that alternate institutions exist does not constitute state protection, even if these institutions are ......
  • Gray v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 12, 2020
    ...of any. The general jurisprudence supports the Board’s conclusions (see, for instance, Pava v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1239 at para 25). (ii) Risk as under section [16] The Board found nothing to suggest any concerns under a forward-looking risk. The Applicant was not a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT