Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd. et al., 2009 BCSC 530

JudgeC.L. Smith, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateApril 24, 2009
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2009 BCSC 530;[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 530 (SC);[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 530
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Marshall et al. v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2050
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 8 d5 Novembro d5 2013
    ...of Consumers Trust and the viability of the voucher program. This is similar to the claim made in Payne v Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd , 2009 BCSC 530. Such an allegation, aside from its inconsistency with the basis of the other claims, more properly belongs in the claim for negligent misrep......
  • Marigold Nursery Ltd. v. Victoria Ford Alliance Ltd., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1255 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 14 d1 Setembro d1 2009
    ...Marigold had no reasonable expectation that the dealership would protect its interests. [114] In Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd. , 2009 BCSC 530, Madam Justice Smith helpfully summarized the current law on negligent misrepresentation, commencing with Hedley Byrne & Co. v. Heller &......
  • Marshall et al. v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership et al., (2015) 373 B.C.A.C. 115 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 25 d2 Novembro d2 2014
    ...There are groups within groups, and potential differences in explanations from sales staff. This case differs substantially from Payne (2009 BCSC 530), which involved the same cash back voucher program. While that case involved a claim in negligent misrepresentation rather than an alleged d......
  • Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd. et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1085 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 4 d3 Agosto d3 2010
    ...to members of the certified class in connection with purchases of motor vehicles. [4] In Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd. , 2009 BCSC 530 [ Payne 1 ], I held that Eagle Ridge did not meet the requisite standard of care and was negligent with respect to a misrepresentation in an October......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Marshall et al. v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2050
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 8 d5 Novembro d5 2013
    ...of Consumers Trust and the viability of the voucher program. This is similar to the claim made in Payne v Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd , 2009 BCSC 530. Such an allegation, aside from its inconsistency with the basis of the other claims, more properly belongs in the claim for negligent misrep......
  • Marigold Nursery Ltd. v. Victoria Ford Alliance Ltd., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1255 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 14 d1 Setembro d1 2009
    ...Marigold had no reasonable expectation that the dealership would protect its interests. [114] In Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd. , 2009 BCSC 530, Madam Justice Smith helpfully summarized the current law on negligent misrepresentation, commencing with Hedley Byrne & Co. v. Heller &......
  • Marshall et al. v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership et al., (2015) 373 B.C.A.C. 115 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 25 d2 Novembro d2 2014
    ...There are groups within groups, and potential differences in explanations from sales staff. This case differs substantially from Payne (2009 BCSC 530), which involved the same cash back voucher program. While that case involved a claim in negligent misrepresentation rather than an alleged d......
  • Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd. et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1085 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 4 d3 Agosto d3 2010
    ...to members of the certified class in connection with purchases of motor vehicles. [4] In Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd. , 2009 BCSC 530 [ Payne 1 ], I held that Eagle Ridge did not meet the requisite standard of care and was negligent with respect to a misrepresentation in an October......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Commonality Is Key: Class Proceeding Certification Denied
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 26 d5 Junho d5 2015
    ...Footnotes 1 Marshall v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership, 2015 BCCA 252. 2 See Payne v. Eagle Ridge Pontiac GMC Ltd., 2009 BCSC 530. 3 Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Reade......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT