Pechout v. Potorocza, (1998) 217 A.R. 377 (QB)
Judge | Lomas, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | February 26, 1998 |
Jurisdiction | Alberta |
Citations | (1998), 217 A.R. 377 (QB) |
Pechout v. Potorocza (1998), 217 A.R. 377 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1998] A.R. TBEd. MR.033
Seigfried Pechout (appellant) v. Frederic A. Potorocza (respondent)
(Action No. 9701-11703)
Indexed As: Pechout v. Potorocza
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial District of Calgary
Lomas, J.
February 26, 1998.
Summary:
The plaintiff purchased a used motorcycle from the defendant. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff discovered that the piston was damaged. The plaintiff sued the defendant for the cost of repairs, alleging that the defendant represented that the motorcycle was in good condition. The trial judge held that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for innocent misrepresentation. The trial judge also held that the Unfair Trade Practices Act did not apply, because the sale was a private sale. The defendant appealed.
The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench allowed the appeal and set aside the award of damages.
Consumer Law - Topic 5
General - Application of consumer protection legislation - Unfair Trade Practices Act - The plaintiff purchased a used motorcycle from the defendant at a private sale - Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff discovered that the piston was damaged - The plaintiff sued the defendant for the cost of repairs, alleging that the defendant represented that the motorcycle was in good condition - The trial judge held that the Unfair Trade Practices Act did not apply because it was a private sale, but that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for innocent misrepresentation - The defendant appealed - The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench affirmed that the Unfair Trade Practice Act did not apply to private sales - The court set aside the award of damages, because damages could not be awarded for innocent misrepresentation.
Damages - Topic 5835
Contracts - Sale of goods - Breach by seller - Misrepresentation - [See Consumer Law - Topic 5 ].
Fraud and Misrepresentation - Topic 2506
Misrepresentation - General principles - Innocent misrepresentation - [See Consumer Law - Topic 5 ].
Cases Noticed:
Ronak v. Jones et al. (1995), 177 A.R. 206 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 8].
Kooiman v. Nichols (1991), 75 Man.R.(2d) 298; 6 W.A.C. 298 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].
Chisling and Hatcher v. Frame (1990), 98 N.S.R.(2d) 417; 263 A.P.R. 417 (Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 11].
Waxman v. Yeandle et al., [1953] O.W.N. 286 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].
Podavin v. Grant et al. (1965), 50 D.L.R.(2d) 565 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 11].
Ross (Frank T.) & Sons (1962) Ltd. v. Con-O-Lab Ltd. (1971), 3 N.B.R.(2d) 647 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].
Heilbut, Symons & Co. v. Buckleton, [1913] A.C. 30 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 11].
Bentley (Dick) Productions Ltd. v. Smith (Harold) (Motors) Ltd., [1965] 1 W.L.R. 623 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].
Newbigging v. Adam (1886), 34 Ch.D. 582 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].
Kupchak v. Dayson Holdings Co. (1965), 53 W.W.R.(N.S.) 65 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].
Redican v. Nesbitt, [1924] S.C.R. 135, refd to. [para. 12].
Leaf v. International Galleries (A firm), [1950] 2 K.B. 66 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].
Beavan v. Anderson (1957), 12 D.L.R.(2d) 69 (Alta. S.C.), refd to. [para. 12].
O'Flaherty v. McKinlay, [1953] 2 D.L.R. 514 (Nfld. S.C.), refd to. [para. 12].
Wade v. Hussein et al. (1995), 166 A.R. 49 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 16].
Director of Trade Practices (Alta.) v. Edanver Consulting Ltd. (1993), 10 Alta. L.R.(3d) 433 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 16].
Statutes Noticed:
Unfair Trade Practices Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. U-3, sect. 1(a)(i), sect. 1(c)(i) [para. 14]; sect. 1(h)(i), sect. 1(h)(ii) [para. 15]; sect. 1(h)(iii) [para. 14].
Counsel:
William E. Gagnon, for the appellant;
Gerald F. Quigley, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard before Lomas, J., of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Calgary, who delivered the following judgment on February 26, 1998.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kosior v. Motz, 2006 SKPC 35
...Sale of Goods - Topic 4068 ]. Cases Noticed: Frey v. Sarvajc (2000), 194 Sask.R. 249 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 21]. Pechout v. Potorocza (1998), 217 A.R. 377 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Both parties appeared in person. This action was heard before Green, P.C.J., of the Saskatchewan Provincial Cou......
-
Keizer v. Autoworld Superstore Alberta Ltd., (2003) 334 A.R. 179 (PC)
...Canada Ltd. et al., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 426; 92 N.R. 1; 57 D.L.R.(4th) 321; [1989] 3 W.W.R. 385, refd to. [para. 14]. Pechout v. Potorocza (1998), 217 A.R. 377 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Basaraba v. St. Alberta Dodge Chrysler Ltd. et al., [2000] A.R. Uned. 318 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 26]. Director......
-
Keizer v. Autoworld Superstore Alberta Ltd., (2003) 334 A.R. 179 (PC)
...Canada Ltd. et al., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 426; 92 N.R. 1; 57 D.L.R.(4th) 321; [1989] 3 W.W.R. 385, refd to. [para. 14]. Pechout v. Potorocza (1998), 217 A.R. 377 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Basaraba v. St. Alberta Dodge Chrysler Ltd. et al., [2000] A.R. Uned. 318 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 26]. Director......
-
Kosior v. Motz, 2006 SKPC 35
...Sale of Goods - Topic 4068 ]. Cases Noticed: Frey v. Sarvajc (2000), 194 Sask.R. 249 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 21]. Pechout v. Potorocza (1998), 217 A.R. 377 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Both parties appeared in person. This action was heard before Green, P.C.J., of the Saskatchewan Provincial Cou......