Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice John T. Henderson |
| Docket Number | 1703 11019 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 18 July 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Pederson v Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, 2020 ABCA 65
...another, related, action. Allstate Insurance Company of Canada appeals the decision of the chambers judge Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531 (Reasons) that the litigation privilege from a prior motor vehicle collision, does not extend to the current litigation brought pursuant to ......
-
Defence + Indemnity - October 2019: Case Summary: Pederson v Allstate Insurance
...that both the insureds and the insurer are clients of insurer-appointed counsel in the tort action. Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531, per Henderson, Facts + Issues The plaintiff, Pederson, was injured in a motor vehicle collision on February 23, 2003. Her vehicle was rear ended ......
-
Case Summary: Pederson v Allstate Insurance
...that both the insureds and the insurer are clients of insurer-appointed counsel in the tort action. Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531, per Henderson, Facts + Issues The plaintiff, Pederson, was injured in a motor vehicle collision on February 23, 2003. Her vehicle was rear ended ......
-
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Teck Metals Ltd.,
...rather than focusing exclusively on the timing of the privilege claim. See, for example: Pederson v. Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531 at para. 47–51, 73; Potash Corporation v. DuPont Canada Inc., 2007 NBQB 389 at para. 13–17; Hall v. Peel Mutual Insurance Company, 2......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Pederson v Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, 2020 ABCA 65
...another, related, action. Allstate Insurance Company of Canada appeals the decision of the chambers judge Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531 (Reasons) that the litigation privilege from a prior motor vehicle collision, does not extend to the current litigation brought pursuant to ......
-
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Teck Metals Ltd.,
...rather than focusing exclusively on the timing of the privilege claim. See, for example: Pederson v. Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531 at para. 47–51, 73; Potash Corporation v. DuPont Canada Inc., 2007 NBQB 389 at para. 13–17; Hall v. Peel Mutual Insurance Company, 2......
-
Terrigno v Fox,
...share the same essential purpose. [72] In Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531, Justice Henderson examined the notion of relationship and stated as follows at para What is Meant by “Closely Related Proceedings?......
4 firm's commentaries
-
Defence + Indemnity - October 2019: Case Summary: Pederson v Allstate Insurance
...that both the insureds and the insurer are clients of insurer-appointed counsel in the tort action. Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531, per Henderson, Facts + Issues The plaintiff, Pederson, was injured in a motor vehicle collision on February 23, 2003. Her vehicle was rear ended ......
-
Case Summary: Pederson v Allstate Insurance
...that both the insureds and the insurer are clients of insurer-appointed counsel in the tort action. Pederson v Allstate Insurance, 2019 ABQB 531, per Henderson, Facts + Issues The plaintiff, Pederson, was injured in a motor vehicle collision on February 23, 2003. Her vehicle was rear ended ......
-
When Does Litigation Privilege Extend To Related Proceedings?
...issue before it was the application of the test to the facts. In the Court below, a chambers judge of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, 2019 ABQB 531, after properly articulating the legal test, indicated that the parties in the two actions were closely related (though not identical), whi......
-
When Does Litigation Privilege Extend to Related Proceedings?
...issue before it was the application of the test to the facts. In the Court below, a chambers judge of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, 2019 ABQB 531, after properly articulating the legal test, indicated that the parties in the two actions were closely related (though not identical), whi......