Perron v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 741
Date02 July 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Kupsar v Regina Provincial Correctional Centre,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 31, 2020
    ...(Emphasis in Ayotte) See also, for example, Ross v Canada, 2003 FCA 296 at para 30, 242 FTR 320; Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 at paras 51–53. These two principles accord with the obligations imposed on a disciplinary panel pursuant to ss. 60(1)(a) and (b) of the Regulatio......
  • Rana v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1014
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 25, 2023
    ...that the ICP act fairly in its proceedings, conforming to legislative and regulatory requirements (Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 at paras 57-58). In the present case, I find that Mr. Rana knew the case against him and had a full and fair opportunity to respond to the charg......
  • Bibeau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1748
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 16, 2022
    ...and acting fairly in conducting proceedings according to legislative and regulatory requirements (Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 at paras 57-58). IV. Analysis [7] Possession of an unauthorized item under s. 40(j) of the Act is not a strict liability offence, meaning the ins......
  • Chace Reveron v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1114
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...the applicable standard of review is the one that is as close as possible to the correctness standard (Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 (CanLII) at para 48; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69, [2019] 1 FCR 121 at para 54). V.  A.&#......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Kupsar v Regina Provincial Correctional Centre,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 31, 2020
    ...(Emphasis in Ayotte) See also, for example, Ross v Canada, 2003 FCA 296 at para 30, 242 FTR 320; Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 at paras 51–53. These two principles accord with the obligations imposed on a disciplinary panel pursuant to ss. 60(1)(a) and (b) of the Regulatio......
  • Bibeau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1748
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 16, 2022
    ...and acting fairly in conducting proceedings according to legislative and regulatory requirements (Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 at paras 57-58). IV. Analysis [7] Possession of an unauthorized item under s. 40(j) of the Act is not a strict liability offence, meaning the ins......
  • Rana v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1014
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 25, 2023
    ...that the ICP act fairly in its proceedings, conforming to legislative and regulatory requirements (Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 at paras 57-58). In the present case, I find that Mr. Rana knew the case against him and had a full and fair opportunity to respond to the charg......
  • Chace Reveron v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1114
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...the applicable standard of review is the one that is as close as possible to the correctness standard (Perron v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 741 (CanLII) at para 48; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69, [2019] 1 FCR 121 at para 54). V.  A.&#......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT