Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85
| Judge | Moreau |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 05, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2019 ABQB 85 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...210 DLR (4th) 753 (SC).............................................................................. 83 Table of Cases 721 Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85..................................................................................................................................... 606 Pet......
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...2007 SCC 8, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 346, at para. 6; Brophy v. Brophy 171 Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement, 2019 ABQB 12; Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85; TMH v 2020 BCSC 804, citing s 221 of the BC Family Law Act. 172 Hamilton v Pearce, [2000] BCJ No 1953 (SC); compare KKS v CSS, [2004] BCJ N......
-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...(TD); B(JB) and B(CB) v B(JA) (1992), 113 NSR (2d) 60 (CA). 163 Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement, 2019 ABQB 12; Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85; Luschynski v Luschynski, [1999] BCJ No 1585 (SC). 164 Hamilton v Pearce, [2000] BCJ No 1953 (SC); compare KKS v CSS, [2004] BCJ No 1574 (SC).......
-
Table of cases
...[2001] NSJ No 452, 210 DLR (4th) 753 (SC)..............................................................................80 Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85 ..................................................................................................................................... 573 Pet......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Olumide v Alberta (Human Rights Commission), 2019 ABQB 186
...and factors involved to impose prospective court access restrictions were recently summarized by Chief Justice Moreau in Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85 at paras 6-16. In brief, court access restrictions may be imposed where future abusive litigation is plausible, and should respond to the scop......
-
Tican v Alamgir,
...problematic conduct is identified: Canada v Olumide, 2017 FCA 42 at para 37; Hill v Bundon, 2018 ABQB 506 at para 79; Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85 at para 17; Feeney v TD General Insurance Company, 2021 ABQB 947, aff'd 2022 ABCA 34 I invite Alberta to initiate a Judicature Act ss 23-23.......
-
Sun v Allwest Insurance Services Ltd.,
...by the alleged abusive litigant. [Emphasis added.] [31] Similarly, Moreau CJ in Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85, at para 17, ... When a court has already concluded that court access restrictions are necessary to manage a litigant, then that is, of itsel......
-
Feeney v TD General Insurance Company,
...by the alleged abusive litigant. [Emphasis added.] [11] Similarly, Moreau CJ in Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85, at para 17, ... When a court has already concluded that court access restrictions are necessary to manage a litigant, then that is, of itsel......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...210 DLR (4th) 753 (SC).............................................................................. 83 Table of Cases 721 Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85..................................................................................................................................... 606 Pet......
-
Table of cases
...[2001] NSJ No 452, 210 DLR (4th) 753 (SC)..............................................................................80 Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85 ..................................................................................................................................... 573 Pet......
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...2007 SCC 8, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 346, at para. 6; Brophy v. Brophy 171 Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement, 2019 ABQB 12; Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85; TMH v 2020 BCSC 804, citing s 221 of the BC Family Law Act. 172 Hamilton v Pearce, [2000] BCJ No 1953 (SC); compare KKS v CSS, [2004] BCJ N......
-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...(TD); B(JB) and B(CB) v B(JA) (1992), 113 NSR (2d) 60 (CA). 163 Laird v (Alberta) Maintenance Enforcement, 2019 ABQB 12; Peters v Keef, 2019 ABQB 85; Luschynski v Luschynski, [1999] BCJ No 1585 (SC). 164 Hamilton v Pearce, [2000] BCJ No 1953 (SC); compare KKS v CSS, [2004] BCJ No 1574 (SC).......