Petro-Canada v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 554

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeMelnick, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,TRADE REGULATION,STATUTES
Date18 July 2008
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Petro-Canada v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 26 Febrero 2009
    ...Compliance Section had conceded were invalid. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported at [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 554 ; 2008 BCSC 841, granted the judicial review. The chambers judge found that the WCB's characterization of Petro-Canada as an employer in respect of the two ......
  • West Fraser Mills Ltd. v. British Columbia (Workers‰Ûª Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2016 BCCA 473
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 28 Noviembre 2016
    ...The Board found that Petro‑Canada did have such responsibilities, but a chambers judge quashed its decision on judicial review (2008 BCSC 841). The judge held that Petro-Canada was not an employer in respect of franchisee service stations, because the employees at those stations had no cont......
2 cases
  • Petro-Canada v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 26 Febrero 2009
    ...Compliance Section had conceded were invalid. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported at [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. 554 ; 2008 BCSC 841, granted the judicial review. The chambers judge found that the WCB's characterization of Petro-Canada as an employer in respect of the two ......
  • West Fraser Mills Ltd. v. British Columbia (Workers‰Ûª Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2016 BCCA 473
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 28 Noviembre 2016
    ...The Board found that Petro‑Canada did have such responsibilities, but a chambers judge quashed its decision on judicial review (2008 BCSC 841). The judge held that Petro-Canada was not an employer in respect of franchisee service stations, because the employees at those stations had no cont......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT