Petrunia v. Petrunia
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Gates, J. |
| Citation | [2012] A.R. Uned. 656,2012 ABQB 568,[2012] A.R. Uned. 656 (QB) |
| Date | 14 September 2012 |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...to spousal support at the time of the original application but 4 Baiu v Baiu , 2015 ONCA 288. 5 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia , 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed , 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney , 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith , [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). 6 Vickers v Vickers , [2001] NSJ No 21......
-
Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...the issue of spousal support, see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Canadian Family Law 10e.indb 186 11/18/2024 10:53:3......
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...focus of the court’s analysis to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For ......
-
Table of Cases
...v Saba, 2017 BCSC 667 207 Petrie v Lindsay, 2019 BCSC 371 272, 89 Petroczi v Petroczi, 2011 BCSC 1321 262 Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568 186 Petruzziello v Albert, 2011 ONSC 4182 58 Petruzziello v Albert, 2014 ONCA 393 55, 58 Petterson v Petterson, 2010 SKQB 418 421 Pettigrew v Pettigre......
Get Started for Free
1 cases
-
Smith v Gulka
...that case, the application of a “reasonableness” test would likely have led to the same result. [135] According to Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568 at para 40, Mercer and VLW ...difficult to reconcile with Hunt, in that they appear to place great weight on the reasonableness of a payor's ......
5 books & journal articles
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...to spousal support at the time of the original application but 4 Baiu v Baiu , 2015 ONCA 288. 5 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia , 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed , 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney , 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith , [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). 6 Vickers v Vickers , [2001] NSJ No 21......
-
Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...the issue of spousal support, see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Canadian Family Law 10e.indb 186 11/18/2024 10:53:3......
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...focus of the court’s analysis to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For ......
-
Table of Cases
...v Saba, 2017 BCSC 667 207 Petrie v Lindsay, 2019 BCSC 371 272, 89 Petroczi v Petroczi, 2011 BCSC 1321 262 Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568 186 Petruzziello v Albert, 2011 ONSC 4182 58 Petruzziello v Albert, 2014 ONCA 393 55, 58 Petterson v Petterson, 2010 SKQB 418 421 Pettigrew v Pettigre......
Get Started for Free
