Petrunia v. Petrunia, [2012] A.R. Uned. 656

JudgeGates, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW
Citation[2012] A.R. Uned. 656,2012 ABQB 568,[2012] A.R. Uned. 656 (QB)
Date14 September 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...focus of the court’s analysis to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For ......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...the issue of spousal support, see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce sp......
  • Smith v Gulka, 2020 ABQB 32
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 13, 2020
    ...test would likely have led to the same result. [135]       According to Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568 at para 40, Mercer and VLW ...difficult to reconcile with Hunt, in that they appear to place great weight on the reasonableness of a payor's emp......
1 cases
  • Smith v Gulka, 2020 ABQB 32
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 13, 2020
    ...test would likely have led to the same result. [135]       According to Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568 at para 40, Mercer and VLW ...difficult to reconcile with Hunt, in that they appear to place great weight on the reasonableness of a payor's emp......
3 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...focus of the court’s analysis to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For ......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...the issue of spousal support, see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce sp......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ...to spousal support at the time of the original application but 4 Baiu v Baiu , 2015 ONCA 288. 5 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia , 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed , 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney , 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith , [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). 6 Vickers v Vickers , [2001] NSJ No 21......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT