Pfizer Canada Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 703 (FC)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | de Montigny, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,PATENTS OF INVENTION,FOOD AND DRUG CONTROL |
| Citation | [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 703 (FC),[2009] F.T.R. Uned. 703,2009 FC 671 |
| Date | 26 June 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Deeproot Green Infrastructure, LLC v. Greenblue Urban North America Inc., 2023 FCA 185
...of claim 1 of the 599 Patent, which claims a single structural cell. Citing paragraph 48 of Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2009 FC 671, DeepRoot observes that a party is liable for patent infringement if any intermediates made during the process to make its end product are found to infr......
-
Valeant Canada LP/Valeant Canada S.E.C. et al. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., (2013) 444 F.T.R. 214 (FC)
...; 80 C.P.R.(4th) 391 ; 2009 FC 675 , refd to. [para. 15]. Pfizer Canada Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 703 ; 2009 FC 671, refd to. [para. 16]. Toronto (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79 et al., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77 ; 311 N.R. 201 ; 179 O.A.C. ......
-
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada v. Apotex Inc., 2017 FC 1061
...36 [Sanofi-Aventis]. [22] The moving party bears the entire burden of proof in a paragraph 6(5)(b) motion: Pfizer Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 671 (CanLII) at para 33. Further, a motion to dismiss will only be granted where it is apparent that there is no arguable case on the merits of ......
-
Janssen Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co. et al., 2016 FC 525
...at para 28 and 36. The moving party bears the entire burden of proof in a s. 6(5)(b) motion: Pfizer Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 671 at para 33. [17] A second person may move under s. 6(5)(b) to dismiss a first person's application on the basis that the first person's affidavit evidence......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Deeproot Green Infrastructure, LLC v. Greenblue Urban North America Inc., 2023 FCA 185
...of claim 1 of the 599 Patent, which claims a single structural cell. Citing paragraph 48 of Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2009 FC 671, DeepRoot observes that a party is liable for patent infringement if any intermediates made during the process to make its end product are found to infr......
-
Valeant Canada LP/Valeant Canada S.E.C. et al. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., (2013) 444 F.T.R. 214 (FC)
...; 80 C.P.R.(4th) 391 ; 2009 FC 675 , refd to. [para. 15]. Pfizer Canada Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., [2009] F.T.R. Uned. 703 ; 2009 FC 671, refd to. [para. 16]. Toronto (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79 et al., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77 ; 311 N.R. 201 ; 179 O.A.C. ......
-
Janssen Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co. et al., 2016 FC 525
...at para 28 and 36. The moving party bears the entire burden of proof in a s. 6(5)(b) motion: Pfizer Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 671 at para 33. [17] A second person may move under s. 6(5)(b) to dismiss a first person's application on the basis that the first person's affidavit evidence......
-
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada v. Apotex Inc., 2017 FC 1061
...36 [Sanofi-Aventis]. [22] The moving party bears the entire burden of proof in a paragraph 6(5)(b) motion: Pfizer Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 671 (CanLII) at para 33. Further, a motion to dismiss will only be granted where it is apparent that there is no arguable case on the merits of ......
Request a trial to view additional results