Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund L.P., 2018 ONCA 98
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Pepall, Lauwers and Huscroft, JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2018 ONCA 98 |
| Docket Number | C62718 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 02 February 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
...1 P.D. 272; Portal Forest Industries Ltd. v. Saunders, [1978] 4 W.W.R. 658; Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund L.P., 2018 ONCA 98, 420 D.L.R. (4th) 335; Davidson v. Three Spruces Realty Ltd. (1977), 79 D.L.R. (3d) 481; Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, 350 F.2......
-
Shared Goals, Divided Jurisdiction: The Uneasy Relationship Between Class Actions and Administrative Law
...with Uber. 37 Ibid at para 54. 38 Ibid at paras 54–55. 39 Ibid at para 60, citing Phoenix Interactive Design Inc v Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 DLR (4th) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 16 • No 1 3) Uber acknowledged that it has greater bargaining power than its......
-
The Death of Champerty: Is Third Party Litigation Funding the New Normal in Class Actions?
...with Uber. 37 Ibid at para 54. 38 Ibid at paras 54–55. 39 Ibid at para 60, citing Phoenix Interactive Design Inc v Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 DLR (4th) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 16 • No 1 3) Uber acknowledged that it has greater bargaining power than its......
-
When Hackers Strike: The Liability of Reckless Record Holders for Intrusion Upon Seclusion
...with Uber. 37 Ibid at para 54. 38 Ibid at paras 54–55. 39 Ibid at para 60, citing Phoenix Interactive Design Inc v Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 DLR (4th) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 16 • No 1 3) Uber acknowledged that it has greater bargaining power than its......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
...1 P.D. 272; Portal Forest Industries Ltd. v. Saunders, [1978] 4 W.W.R. 658; Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund L.P., 2018 ONCA 98, 420 D.L.R. (4th) 335; Davidson v. Three Spruces Realty Ltd. (1977), 79 D.L.R. (3d) 481; Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, 350 F.2......
-
Jordan v. CIBC Mortgages Inc., 2019 ONSC 1178
...Titus is the leading authority in Ontario on the test for unconscionability: Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund L.P., 2018 ONCA 98 at para. 39. In Phoenix Interactive, the court specifically rejected the test in Morrison v. Coast Finance Ltd., a 1965 decision of the Brit......
-
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc., 2019 ONCA 1
...Inc., 2007 ONCA 573, 284 D.L.R. (4th) 734, at para. 38, recently affirmed in Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund L.P., 2018 ONCA 98, 420 D.L.R. (4th) 335. They 1. a grossly unfair and improvident transaction; 2. a victim's lack of independent legal advice or other suitabl......
-
Sanders v. Canada's Choice Investments Inc.,
...that Ms. Sanders must meet the four-part test for unconscionability found in Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 D.L.R. (4th) 335, at para. 15. I disagree. The Supreme Court of Canada expressly rejected the Phoenix test in its 2020 decision in Uber, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 29 February 2)
...ONCA 80 , the Court canvassed the law of internet defamation and damages. In Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund L.P., 2018 ONCA 98, the Court confirmed that the four-part test test set out in Titus v. William F. Cooke Enterprises Inc., 2007 ONCA 573 , rather than the tw......
-
Uber V. Heller: Supreme Court Throws Out Dutch Arbitration Clause As Unconscionable
...1 Titus v. William F. Cooke Enterprises Inc. 2007 ONCA 573, at para. 38, and Phoenix Interactive Design Inc. v. Alterinvest II Fund L.P., 2018 ONCA 98. Originally published by Aird & Berlis, The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist......
8 books & journal articles
-
Entering a Legal Void: Independent Contractors and Class Actions Post-heller
...with Uber. 37 Ibid at para 54. 38 Ibid at paras 54–55. 39 Ibid at para 60, citing Phoenix Interactive Design Inc v Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 DLR (4th) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 16 • No 1 3) Uber acknowledged that it has greater bargaining power than its......
-
Introduction
...with Uber. 37 Ibid at para 54. 38 Ibid at paras 54–55. 39 Ibid at para 60, citing Phoenix Interactive Design Inc v Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 DLR (4th) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 16 • No 1 3) Uber acknowledged that it has greater bargaining power than its......
-
A Call for Clarity: Ontario’s Disjointed Privacy Class Actions and the Need for Privacy Law Reform
...with Uber. 37 Ibid at para 54. 38 Ibid at paras 54–55. 39 Ibid at para 60, citing Phoenix Interactive Design Inc v Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 DLR (4th) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 16 • No 1 3) Uber acknowledged that it has greater bargaining power than its......
-
Shared Goals, Divided Jurisdiction: The Uneasy Relationship Between Class Actions and Administrative Law
...with Uber. 37 Ibid at para 54. 38 Ibid at paras 54–55. 39 Ibid at para 60, citing Phoenix Interactive Design Inc v Alterinvest II Fund LP, 2018 ONCA 98, 420 DLR (4th) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 16 • No 1 3) Uber acknowledged that it has greater bargaining power than its......
Request a trial to view additional results