Pierce v. Jivraj et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 926
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Dley, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS |
| Citation | [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 926,2014 BCSC 926,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 926 (SC) |
| Date | 28 May 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...Piller Preservation Orders in Canada: A Practical Guide 158 Piche v Chiu, 2013 BCSC 20 Pierce v Jivraj, 2013 BCSC 1850 Pierce v Jivraj, 2014 BCSC 926; 2015 BCCA188 113, 242 127, 234, 242, 244 Pirani v Esmail, 2013 ONSC 4199 133/136 Pixhug Media v Steeves, 2016 BCCA 433 171,172 PJSC Tatneft ......
-
Pierce v. Jivraj et al., 2015 BCCA 188
...was made by Mr. Jivraj to cross-examine Mr. Baynham or Mr. Reid on their affidavits. Special Costs Reasons [37] In its reasons indexed as 2014 BCSC 926, the Court noted that Mr. Baynham had over 37 years at the bar and ought to have known that an Anton Piller application requires fastidious......
-
Fontaine et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 717
...circumstances is a significant issue. 4. Written Submissions of the Attorney General of Canada, paragraph 37. 5. Pierce v Jivraj , 2014 BCSC 926, at para 20. [End of document] sted manner that opposing counsel attributed to him. Nonetheless, his failure to investigate and preference to Mr. ......
-
Lack of Full Disclosure: Special Costs in Failed Anton Piller Order
...and their counsel must exercise extreme caution when using APOs. The British Columbia Supreme Court’s recent decision in Pierce v Jivraj, 2014 BCSC 926 represents a warning for employers and their counsel in seeking an APO. In that case, the Court ordered special costs personally against th......
2 cases
-
Pierce v. Jivraj et al., 2015 BCCA 188
...was made by Mr. Jivraj to cross-examine Mr. Baynham or Mr. Reid on their affidavits. Special Costs Reasons [37] In its reasons indexed as 2014 BCSC 926, the Court noted that Mr. Baynham had over 37 years at the bar and ought to have known that an Anton Piller application requires fastidious......
-
Fontaine et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 717
...circumstances is a significant issue. 4. Written Submissions of the Attorney General of Canada, paragraph 37. 5. Pierce v Jivraj , 2014 BCSC 926, at para 20. [End of document] sted manner that opposing counsel attributed to him. Nonetheless, his failure to investigate and preference to Mr. ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Lack of Full Disclosure: Special Costs in Failed Anton Piller Order
...and their counsel must exercise extreme caution when using APOs. The British Columbia Supreme Court’s recent decision in Pierce v Jivraj, 2014 BCSC 926 represents a warning for employers and their counsel in seeking an APO. In that case, the Court ordered special costs personally against th......
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Piller Preservation Orders in Canada: A Practical Guide 158 Piche v Chiu, 2013 BCSC 20 Pierce v Jivraj, 2013 BCSC 1850 Pierce v Jivraj, 2014 BCSC 926; 2015 BCCA188 113, 242 127, 234, 242, 244 Pirani v Esmail, 2013 ONSC 4199 133/136 Pixhug Media v Steeves, 2016 BCCA 433 171,172 PJSC Tatneft ......