PIETT v. GLOBAL LEARNING GROUP INC.,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | McCREARY J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKQB 232 |
| Citation | 2021 SKQB 232 |
| Date | 27 August 2021 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | QBG 590 of 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
MacInnis v Bayer Inc.,
...that costs have been awarded when a certification application is dismissed: see, for example, Piett v Global Learning Group Inc., 2021 SKQB 232, 2021 DTC 5115 [ Piett]; Kish v Facebook Canada Ltd., 2021 SKQB 198 [ Kish]; and M.R.L.P. v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 SKQB 101. However, cost......
-
2023 BCSC 428,
...BCE Inc. et al, 2016 MBCA 32 at para. 40, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd 37011 (22 December 2016); Piett v. Global Leaning Group Inc., 2021 SKQB 232 at para.49, leave to appeal ref'd 2022 SKCA 41 Ms. Tanchak argues that while the Varley Plaintiffs describe their intended application......
-
Tanchak v British Columbia,
...BCE Inc. et al, 2016 MBCA 32 at para. 40, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd 37011 (22 December 2016); Piett v. Global Leaning Group Inc., 2021 SKQB 232 at para.49, leave to appeal ref'd 2022 SKCA 41 Ms. Tanchak argues that while the Varley Plaintiffs describe their intended application......
3 cases
-
MacInnis v Bayer Inc.,
...that costs have been awarded when a certification application is dismissed: see, for example, Piett v Global Learning Group Inc., 2021 SKQB 232, 2021 DTC 5115 [ Piett]; Kish v Facebook Canada Ltd., 2021 SKQB 198 [ Kish]; and M.R.L.P. v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 SKQB 101. However, cost......
-
2023 BCSC 428,
...BCE Inc. et al, 2016 MBCA 32 at para. 40, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd 37011 (22 December 2016); Piett v. Global Leaning Group Inc., 2021 SKQB 232 at para.49, leave to appeal ref'd 2022 SKCA 41 Ms. Tanchak argues that while the Varley Plaintiffs describe their intended application......
-
Tanchak v British Columbia,
...BCE Inc. et al, 2016 MBCA 32 at para. 40, leave to appeal to SCC ref'd 37011 (22 December 2016); Piett v. Global Leaning Group Inc., 2021 SKQB 232 at para.49, leave to appeal ref'd 2022 SKCA 41 Ms. Tanchak argues that while the Varley Plaintiffs describe their intended application......