Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio
Citation2020 ABCA 366
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date19 October 2020
Docket Number1901-0138-AC; 2001-0046-AC; 2001-0047-AC; 2001-0048-AC; 2001-0049-AC; 2001-0050-AC; 2001-0051-AC; 2001-0099-AC
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...810 Williams v Williams (2007 NLUFC) 341 Williams v Williams (2010 SKCA) 250 Williams v Williams (2015 ABCA) 315 Williams v Williams (2020 ABCA) 366 Williams v Williams (2020 ONSC) 816 Williamson v Williamson (2004 SKCA) 90 Williamson v Williamson (2016 BCCA) 654, 655, 658, 659 Willick v Wi......
  • AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v.......
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 2, 2022
    ...a bias towards any one party just because that party was unsuccessful on one particular application”: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366 at para 55, quoting from Alberta Health Services v Wong, 2018 ABCA 104 at para [29]          ......
  • Nadarasah v. Uthayakumar,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 4, 2022
    ...rather than substantive decisions of a case management nature require a particularly high level of deference: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366 at paras 26-28. Appeals from scheduling decisions are discouraged, as an appellate court will rarely hear and even more rarely interfere wit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v.......
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 2, 2022
    ...a bias towards any one party just because that party was unsuccessful on one particular application”: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366 at para 55, quoting from Alberta Health Services v Wong, 2018 ABCA 104 at para [29]          ......
  • Nadarasah v. Uthayakumar,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 4, 2022
    ...rather than substantive decisions of a case management nature require a particularly high level of deference: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366 at paras 26-28. Appeals from scheduling decisions are discouraged, as an appellate court will rarely hear and even more rarely interfere wit......
  • Lloyd v de Walle,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • October 3, 2022
    ...Enhancement Act, Director), 2021 ABCA 15 at para 19, citing Balogun v Pandher, 2010 ABCA 40 at paras 7, 9 and Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366 at paras 21-28. The assessment of the facts, the application of the law to those facts, and the ultimate determination on whether summary re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...810 Williams v Williams (2007 NLUFC) 341 Williams v Williams (2010 SKCA) 250 Williams v Williams (2015 ABCA) 315 Williams v Williams (2020 ABCA) 366 Williams v Williams (2020 ONSC) 816 Williamson v Williamson (2004 SKCA) 90 Williamson v Williamson (2016 BCCA) 654, 655, 658, 659 Willick v Wi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT