Piller v. Grant J. Schmidt and Schmidt Law Office
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | Tholl |
| Citation | 2019 SKQB 16 |
| Date | 17 January 2019 |
| Docket Number | QBG 212 of 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
STEPHENS v. PRO BONO LAW SASKATCHEWAN INC.
...that demonstrate a deficient standard of care. See Central Trust Co. v Rafuse, [1986] 2 SCR 147 [Central Trust], and Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16, 42 CPC (8th) 164 [31] &......
-
LEFFLER v. AARON BEHIEL LEGAL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
...by way of an actual or implied contract, the tort of negligence, or a fiduciary relationship between them. As noted in Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 48 [Piller], in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must establish that a duty of care existed, that the standard of care was breached ......
-
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SASKATCHEWAN
...9-26 must be considered in the overall context of efficiency and proportionality reflected in foundational Rule 1-3: Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 27 and the cases cited therein. [52] &nb......
3 cases
-
STEPHENS v. PRO BONO LAW SASKATCHEWAN INC.
...that demonstrate a deficient standard of care. See Central Trust Co. v Rafuse, [1986] 2 SCR 147 [Central Trust], and Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16, 42 CPC (8th) 164 [31]                    &......
-
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SASKATCHEWAN
...9-26 must be considered in the overall context of efficiency and proportionality reflected in foundational Rule 1-3: Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 27 and the cases cited therein. [52]                &#x......
-
LEFFLER v. AARON BEHIEL LEGAL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
...by way of an actual or implied contract, the tort of negligence, or a fiduciary relationship between them. As noted in Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 48 [Piller], in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must establish that a duty of care existed, that the standard of care was brea......
