Piller v. Grant J. Schmidt and Schmidt Law Office, 2019 SKQB 16
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Tholl |
| Docket Number | QBG 212 of 2015 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 17 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
STEPHENS v. PRO BONO LAW SASKATCHEWAN INC.,
...that demonstrate a deficient standard of care. See Central Trust Co. v Rafuse, [1986] 2 SCR 147 [Central Trust], and Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16, 42 CPC (8th) 164 [31] &......
-
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SASKATCHEWAN,
...9-26 must be considered in the overall context of efficiency and proportionality reflected in foundational Rule 1-3: Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 27 and the cases cited therein. [52] &#x......
-
LEFFLER v. AARON BEHIEL LEGAL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION,
...by way of an actual or implied contract, the tort of negligence, or a fiduciary relationship between them. As noted in Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 48 [Piller], in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must establish that a duty of care existed, that the standard of care was brea......
3 cases
-
STEPHENS v. PRO BONO LAW SASKATCHEWAN INC.,
...that demonstrate a deficient standard of care. See Central Trust Co. v Rafuse, [1986] 2 SCR 147 [Central Trust], and Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16, 42 CPC (8th) 164 [31] &......
-
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SASKATCHEWAN,
...9-26 must be considered in the overall context of efficiency and proportionality reflected in foundational Rule 1-3: Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 27 and the cases cited therein. [52] &#x......
-
LEFFLER v. AARON BEHIEL LEGAL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION,
...by way of an actual or implied contract, the tort of negligence, or a fiduciary relationship between them. As noted in Piller v Schmidt, 2019 SKQB 16 at para 48 [Piller], in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must establish that a duty of care existed, that the standard of care was brea......