Pinsky v. Smiley et al., 2015 ONCA 52
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Weiler, Watt and Epstein, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | 2015 ONCA 52,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 30,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 30 (CA) |
| Date | 22 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 26-30, 2015)
...the appellant's notice period argument, and the trial judge's calculation of expenses was supported by the facts. Pinsky v. Smiley, 2015 ONCA 52 [Weiler, Watt and Epstein Counsel: M. Cheng, for the moving parties, responding parties by way of cross-motion A. Pinsky, acting in person Keyword......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 26-30, 2015)
...the appellant's notice period argument, and the trial judge's calculation of expenses was supported by the facts. Pinsky v. Smiley, 2015 ONCA 52 [Weiler, Watt and Epstein Counsel: M. Cheng, for the moving parties, responding parties by way of cross-motion A. Pinsky, acting in person Keyword......