Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Centa |
| Citation | 2022 ONSC 5230 |
| Date | 15 September 2022 |
| Docket Number | CV-20-650903 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
25 practice notes
-
McPherson v. Global Growth Assets Inc.
...595, at paras. 111-16. [97] Halupa v. Sagemedica Inc., 2019 ONSC 7411, at para. 31; Galea, at para. 282; Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230, 2023 C.L.L.C. 210-016, at paras. 118-20. [98] Whiten, at para. 36. [99] McPherson v. Global Growth Assets Inc., 2020 ONSC 1828. [100] Giacom......
-
Saskatoon Minor Basketball Association v. MacDonald
...Mr. S: 20 Mr. A: 24 Not specified Wilkinson v Valgold, 2021 BCSC 572 12 - President and CEO 68 18 $210,000 Pohl v Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 28 - Sales Manager (8 years) - Interviewing and hiring new sales associates - Creating schedules for staff - Supervising sales associates, p......
-
Giacomodonato v. PearTree Securities Inc.
...111 to 116. [35] Halupa v. Sagemedica Inc., 2019 ONSC 7411; Galea v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2017 ONSC 245; Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230, at paras. 118 to 120. [36] Whiten, at para. 36. [37] M & P Drug Mart Inc. v. Norton, 2022 ONCA 398, 79 C.C.E.L. (4th) 171, at para. 32......
-
Lachapelle v. St. Laurent Automotive Group Inc.
...salesperson dismissed during the second week of March 2020, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: see also Pohl v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230, 83 C.C.E.L. (4th) 45, at paras. [41] Here, similar to the above decisions, the plaintiff was terminated at the onset of the COVID-19 pand......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
McPherson v Global Growth Assets Inc.
...595, at paras. 111–16. 97 Halupa v. Sagemedica Inc., 2019 ONSC 7411, at para. 31; Galea, at para. 282; Pohl v. Hudson's Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230, 2023 C.L.L.C. 210-016, at paras. 98 Whiten, at para. 36. 99 McPherson v. Global Growth Assets Inc., 2020 ONSC 1828. 100 Giacomodonato v. PearT......
-
Wilds v 1959612 Ontario Inc.
...distress and hurt feelings resulting from dismissal, which are not compensable. 117 Ms. Wilds relies on Pohl v. Hudson's Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (“ Pohl”) in support of her position that she should be granted mental distress damages. However, in that case, the employee had adduced evide......
-
Stride v Syra Group et Al
...that medical evidence is not required for a moral damage award: Saadati v Morehead, 2017 SCC 28. 86 In Pohl v Hudson's Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230, the court held as follows: Moral damages are available where the employer engages in a breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing at the......
-
Chan v NYX Capital Corporation
...in the gut” and experienced “feelings of humiliation, diminished self-worth, anxiety, and depression” ( Pohl v. Hudson's Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230, at paras. 61–63). I am not satisfied, based on the record before me, that Mr. Chan has experienced the type of distress required by law to gr......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Don't Make Promises You Can't (Or More Accurately, Don't Intend To) Keep Or It May Come Back To Bite You In The Bottom (Line)!
...since Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays,2008 SCC 39 , through Bhasinv.Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 and most recently in Pohl v Hudson Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230 (excellent commentary on that case by our own Danielle Jager can be found here), awards for these types of damages are certainly more prevalent n......