Pompey v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862
| Judge | Russell, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 22, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2016 FC 862 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Hamami v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 222
...principle that a decision maker may not supplement the reasons in his decision (Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 at para 26; Qin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 147 at para 18). [28] I am satisfied that the affidavit of the IRCC officer is not impro......
-
Gebreselasse v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 865
...paras 70–71; Khela v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 134 at para 18; Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 at para 36; Alvarez Vasquez v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 1083 at para [50] It is also well established that ev......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 687
...Officer’s affidavits simply provide context and explain the reasoning, which is permitted (Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 at paras 25 and 32; Kalra v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FC 941 at para 15 [Kalra]. The Respondent notes that the O......
-
Kaur v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1581
...Officer’s finding is factual and highly discretionary. The Respondent cites Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 (CanLII) for the proposition that immigration officers are simply involved in a fact-finding process, and their role is to determine whether th......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Hamami v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 222
...principle that a decision maker may not supplement the reasons in his decision (Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 at para 26; Qin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 147 at para 18). [28] I am satisfied that the affidavit of the IRCC officer is not impro......
-
Gebreselasse v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...paras 70–71; Khela v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 134 at para 18; Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 at para 36; Alvarez Vasquez v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 1083 at para [50] It is also well established that ev......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 687
...Officer’s affidavits simply provide context and explain the reasoning, which is permitted (Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 at paras 25 and 32; Kalra v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FC 941 at para 15 [Kalra]. The Respondent notes that the O......
-
Kaur v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1581
...Officer’s finding is factual and highly discretionary. The Respondent cites Pompey v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 862 (CanLII) for the proposition that immigration officers are simply involved in a fact-finding process, and their role is to determine whether th......
Request a trial to view additional results