Ponican v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 232

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 232
Date11 February 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Eroglu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1305
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 16 Septiembre 2022
    ...(Ntamag v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2020 FC 40 at paras 8-9; Ponican v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 232 at para 23). The Respondent notes that, in order to discourage immigration fraud, both sections 4(1) and 4.1 of the IRPR operate as exceptions to th......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 Febrero 2022
    ...without any further supporting evidence, is insufficient to find that the officer was unreasonable on this front [Ponican v Canada, 2020 FC 232, at para 18]. [23] Further, while the Applicant submits the officer disregarded his evidence of on-the-job training in managing and dealing with cl......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1731
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 2022
    ...unduly encumber the administrative efficiency and hinder expeditious decision making (Ponican v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 232 at para 23). However, where the evidence otherwise establishes the requirements for a visa are met and an officer denies a visa on the basis that......
3 cases
  • Eroglu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1305
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 16 Septiembre 2022
    ...(Ntamag v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2020 FC 40 at paras 8-9; Ponican v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 232 at para 23). The Respondent notes that, in order to discourage immigration fraud, both sections 4(1) and 4.1 of the IRPR operate as exceptions to th......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 240
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 Febrero 2022
    ...without any further supporting evidence, is insufficient to find that the officer was unreasonable on this front [Ponican v Canada, 2020 FC 232, at para 18]. [23] Further, while the Applicant submits the officer disregarded his evidence of on-the-job training in managing and dealing with cl......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1731
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 2022
    ...unduly encumber the administrative efficiency and hinder expeditious decision making (Ponican v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 232 at para 23). However, where the evidence otherwise establishes the requirements for a visa are met and an officer denies a visa on the basis that......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT