Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board, 2002 BCSC 1369

JudgeVickers, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 25, 2002
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2002 BCSC 1369;[2002] B.C.T.C. 1369 (SC)

Ponich Poultry Farm v. Marketing Bd., [2002] B.C.T.C. 1369 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2002] B.C.T.C. TBEd. OC.045

Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. (appellant) v. British Columbia Marketing Board (respondent)

(L020131; 2002 BCSC 1369)

Indexed As: Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Vickers, J.

September 25, 2002.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Trade Regulation - Topic 3532

Marketing of agricultural products - Boards - Decisions - Scope of review - See paragraphs 1 to 26.

Cases Noticed:

Conseil de la magistrature (N.-B.) v. Moreau-Bérubé (2002), 281 N.R. 201; 245 N.B.R.(2d) 201; 636 A.P.R. 201; 209 D.L.R.(4th) 1 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 24].

Moreau-Bérubé v. New Brunswick (Judicial Council) - see Conseil de la magistrature (N.-B.) v. Moreau-Bérubé.

Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982, addendum [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1222; 226 N.R. 201; 160 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to. [para. 24].

Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817; 243 N.R. 22; 174 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to. [para. 24].

Director of Investigation and Research, Competition Act v. Southam Inc. et al., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 748; 209 N.R. 20; 144 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 24].

National Corn Growers' Association et al. v. Canadian Import Tribunal, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1324; 114 N.R. 81; 74 D.L.R.(4th) 449; 45 Admin. L.R. 161, refd to. [para. 25].

Pezim v. British Columbia Securities Commission et al., [1994] 2 S.C.R. 557; 168 N.R. 321; 46 B.C.A.C. 1; 75 W.A.C. 1; [1994] 7 W.W.R. 1; 92 B.C.L.R.(2d) 145; 14 B.C.R.(2d) 217; 22 Admin. L.R.(2d) 1; 114 D.L.R.(4th) 385, refd to. [para. 26].

Milk Marketing Board (B.C.) v. Aquilini et al. (1998), 112 B.C.A.C. 119; 182 W.A.C. 119; 165 D.L.R.(4th) 626 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].

Horizon Hatchery Ltd. v. British Columbia Broiler Hatching Egg Commission, [1992] B.C.J. No. 595 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 30].

Truong Mushroom Farm Ltd. et al. v. Mushroom Marketing Board (B.C.) et al. (1999), 10 B.C.T.C. 16 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 30].

Money's Mushrooms Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia Marketing Board et al. (1999), 26 B.C.T.C. 384 (S.C.), affd. (2001), 155 B.C.A.C. 311; 254 W.A.C. 311 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].

MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. et al. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) et al. (2000), 138 B.C.A.C. 290; 226 W.A.C. 290; 76 B.C.L.R.(3d) 71 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

Statutes Noticed:

Natural Products Marketing (B.C.) Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 330, sect. 2(1), sect. 3(1) [para. 4]; sect. 9(1) [para. 1].

Counsel:

W.A. Baker, for the appellant;

F.A.V. Falzon, for the respondent;

S.P. Pike, for the British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board.

This appeal was heard in Chambers, on September 12 and 13, 2002, before Vickers, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on September 25, 2002.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • Reid et al. v. Egg Marketing Board (B.C.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 985 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 22 Abril 2003
    ...unreasonableness", according to the principles identified by Vickers J. in Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board , 2002 BCSC 1369 at ¶30-1. [13] The Board notes also that the B.C. Marketing Board referred to the recent decision of L. Smith J. on a strikingly similar i......
  • Stewart v. Farm Industry Review Board (B.C.) et al., 2010 BCSC 602
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 Abril 2010
    ...Marketing Board (1979), 9 Alta L.R. (2d) 217 at 227-228 (Dist. Ct.); and Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board , 2002 BCSC 1369 at para. 29. Discussion a) Did the BCFIRB panel consider the issues raised by the Stewarts? [44] Pursuant to s. 58 (2)(b) of the Administrat......
  • Global Greenhouse v. Marketing Bd., [2003] B.C.T.C. 1508 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 1 Octubre 2003
    ...- See paragraphs 72 to 128. Cases Noticed: Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board, [2002] B.C.T.C. 1369; 2002 BCSC 1369, refd to. [para. Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. v. Canada et al., [1982] 2 S.C.R. 2; 44 N.R. 354; 137 D.L.R.(3d) 558, refd to. [para. 68]. Delight et al. v. ......
  • Patton v. British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board, 2020 BCSC 554
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 8 Abril 2020
    ...that the commodities are regulated in accordance with sound marketing policy: Ponich Poultry Farm v. British Columbia (Marketing Board), 2002 BCSC 1369 at para. [13]        Somewhat unusually, FIRB has, in addition to its regulatory functions, a broad appe......
4 cases
  • Reid et al. v. Egg Marketing Board (B.C.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 985 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 22 Abril 2003
    ...unreasonableness", according to the principles identified by Vickers J. in Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board , 2002 BCSC 1369 at ¶30-1. [13] The Board notes also that the B.C. Marketing Board referred to the recent decision of L. Smith J. on a strikingly similar i......
  • Stewart v. Farm Industry Review Board (B.C.) et al., 2010 BCSC 602
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 Abril 2010
    ...Marketing Board (1979), 9 Alta L.R. (2d) 217 at 227-228 (Dist. Ct.); and Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board , 2002 BCSC 1369 at para. 29. Discussion a) Did the BCFIRB panel consider the issues raised by the Stewarts? [44] Pursuant to s. 58 (2)(b) of the Administrat......
  • Global Greenhouse v. Marketing Bd., [2003] B.C.T.C. 1508 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 1 Octubre 2003
    ...- See paragraphs 72 to 128. Cases Noticed: Ponich Poultry Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Marketing Board, [2002] B.C.T.C. 1369; 2002 BCSC 1369, refd to. [para. Maple Lodge Farms Ltd. v. Canada et al., [1982] 2 S.C.R. 2; 44 N.R. 354; 137 D.L.R.(3d) 558, refd to. [para. 68]. Delight et al. v. ......
  • Patton v. British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board, 2020 BCSC 554
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 8 Abril 2020
    ...that the commodities are regulated in accordance with sound marketing policy: Ponich Poultry Farm v. British Columbia (Marketing Board), 2002 BCSC 1369 at para. [13]        Somewhat unusually, FIRB has, in addition to its regulatory functions, a broad appe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT