Potts v. Alexis Nakota Siouz Nation, 2019 FC 1121
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 1121 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 30 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Aboriginal Title, Self-Government, and Indigenous Jurisdiction in Canadian Law.
...2019 FC 732, at paras 31-40; Clark v Abegweit First Nation Band Council, 2019 FC 721 at para 79; Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 at para (162) See Harpe v Massie and Ta 'an Kwach 'an Council, 2006 YKSC 1. (163) Family Law Act, RSO 1990, c F.3. (164) Beaver v Hill, 2017 ONSC......
-
McCarthy v. Whitefish Lake First Nation #128, 2023 FC 220
...knowledge transfer; and The probative value clearly outweighs any prejudicial effects. [44] In Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 [Potts], Justice McDonald held that hearsay evidence is not necessary or reliable when the party introducing the evidence fails to explain why the ......
-
Coutlee v. Lower Nicola First Nation, 2024 FC 47
...FCA 122 [Horseman FCA]; Orr v Boucher, 2011 FC 1035 at paras 58-60 [Orr], aff’d 2012 FCA 115; Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 at paras 40-42 [79] Here, the Applicant ought to have availed himself of the alternative process set out in the Rules. The Rules, adopted by ......
-
Johnstone v. Mistawasis Nêhiyawak First Nation, 2022 FC 492
...parties. Accordingly, this evidence cannot be considered necessary or reliable and is inadmissible (Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 at para 28). V. Issues [30] In my view, after hearing the parties’ submissions, the issues are best characterized as: What is the appropriate ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
McCarthy v. Whitefish Lake First Nation #128, 2023 FC 220
...knowledge transfer; and The probative value clearly outweighs any prejudicial effects. [44] In Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 [Potts], Justice McDonald held that hearsay evidence is not necessary or reliable when the party introducing the evidence fails to explain why the ......
-
Coutlee v. Lower Nicola First Nation, 2024 FC 47
...FCA 122 [Horseman FCA]; Orr v Boucher, 2011 FC 1035 at paras 58-60 [Orr], aff’d 2012 FCA 115; Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 at paras 40-42 [79] Here, the Applicant ought to have availed himself of the alternative process set out in the Rules. The Rules, adopted by ......
-
Johnstone v. Mistawasis Nêhiyawak First Nation, 2022 FC 492
...parties. Accordingly, this evidence cannot be considered necessary or reliable and is inadmissible (Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 at para 28). V. Issues [30] In my view, after hearing the parties’ submissions, the issues are best characterized as: What is the appropriate ......
-
Beeds v. Pelican Lake First Nation, 2022 FC 1709
...nom Joly v Gadwa, 2017 FCA 203; Henry v Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation, 2017 FC 1038 [Henry]; Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 [Potts]; Whitford v Red Pheasant First Nation, 2022 FC 436 [Whitford]. [27] In Henry, at paragraphs 57–59, my colleague Justice Leonard......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Aboriginal Title, Self-Government, and Indigenous Jurisdiction in Canadian Law.
...2019 FC 732, at paras 31-40; Clark v Abegweit First Nation Band Council, 2019 FC 721 at para 79; Potts v Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation, 2019 FC 1121 at para (162) See Harpe v Massie and Ta 'an Kwach 'an Council, 2006 YKSC 1. (163) Family Law Act, RSO 1990, c F.3. (164) Beaver v Hill, 2017 ONSC......