Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeWatchuk, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW,COURTS,PRACTICE,CONFLICT OF LAWS
Citation2015 BCSC 1399,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1399 (SC),[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1399
Date10 August 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • K.M.P. v. A.E.J., 2020 BCSC 1916
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 4, 2020
    ...the parties have highlighted the following cases: Kane v. Proffitt, 2018 BCCA 106, Kelly v. Sidhu, 2020 BCSC 393, Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399, C.R.J. v. L.S.J., 2013 BCSC 1781, and G.B. v. D.B., 2019 BCPC 69. [18]       I have reviewed the principles fro......
  • J.F. v. M.M.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 7, 2022
    ...2016 BCSC 1438, Turner v. Turner, 2013 BCSC 1988, Byrne v. Byrne, 2015 BCSC 318, Kelly v. Sidhu, 2020 BCSC 393, and Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399.  In this case, as in Turner, the Provincial Court has completed two lengthy contested hearings regarding A., one in the FLA proceeding......
  • Kelly v. Sidhu, 2020 BCSC 393
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 13, 2020
    ...even more strongly of the view that if such jurisdiction exists, I should and would decline to exercise it. [17] In Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399, Madam Justice Watchuk declined to exercise jurisdiction under the Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.) and ordered that future applic......
  • D.A.F. v. R.D.F., 2017 BCSC 873
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 25, 2017
    ...a case, the Supreme Court judge will be deemed to have acted as a member of the Provincial Court. [18] However, in Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399 [Power], Madam Justice Watchuk held that s. 194 of the FLA cannot prevent the Supreme Court from exercising its jurisdiction under s. 16 of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • K.M.P. v. A.E.J., 2020 BCSC 1916
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 4, 2020
    ...the parties have highlighted the following cases: Kane v. Proffitt, 2018 BCCA 106, Kelly v. Sidhu, 2020 BCSC 393, Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399, C.R.J. v. L.S.J., 2013 BCSC 1781, and G.B. v. D.B., 2019 BCPC 69. [18]       I have reviewed the principles fro......
  • J.F. v. M.M.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 7, 2022
    ...2016 BCSC 1438, Turner v. Turner, 2013 BCSC 1988, Byrne v. Byrne, 2015 BCSC 318, Kelly v. Sidhu, 2020 BCSC 393, and Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399.  In this case, as in Turner, the Provincial Court has completed two lengthy contested hearings regarding A., one in the FLA proceeding......
  • Kelly v. Sidhu, 2020 BCSC 393
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 13, 2020
    ...even more strongly of the view that if such jurisdiction exists, I should and would decline to exercise it. [17] In Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399, Madam Justice Watchuk declined to exercise jurisdiction under the Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.) and ordered that future applic......
  • D.A.F. v. R.D.F., 2017 BCSC 873
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 25, 2017
    ...a case, the Supreme Court judge will be deemed to have acted as a member of the Provincial Court. [18] However, in Power v. Spadafora, 2015 BCSC 1399 [Power], Madam Justice Watchuk held that s. 194 of the FLA cannot prevent the Supreme Court from exercising its jurisdiction under s. 16 of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT