Prasad v. Prasad,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Forth |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 430 |
| Docket Number | E056305 |
| Date | 11 March 2021 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 780,
...can prove that an equal division would be “significantly unfair”: ss. 81, and 95–96 of the FLA. 33 Prasad v. Prasad, 2021 BCSC 430, involved an application to set aside an undefended final order that included, among other things, an unequal division of property. Justice......
-
Cho v Kim,
...can prove that an equal division would be “significantly unfair”: ss. 81, and 95–96 of the FLA. 33 Prasad v. Prasad, 2021 BCSC 430, involved an application to set aside an undefended final order that included, among other things, an unequal division of property. Justice......
2 cases
-
2023 BCSC 780,
...can prove that an equal division would be “significantly unfair”: ss. 81, and 95–96 of the FLA. 33 Prasad v. Prasad, 2021 BCSC 430, involved an application to set aside an undefended final order that included, among other things, an unequal division of property. Justice......
-
Cho v Kim,
...can prove that an equal division would be “significantly unfair”: ss. 81, and 95–96 of the FLA. 33 Prasad v. Prasad, 2021 BCSC 430, involved an application to set aside an undefended final order that included, among other things, an unequal division of property. Justice......