Pratt v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2020 NSCA 39
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Van den Eynden |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Case Date | May 05, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Citations | 2020 NSCA 39 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
R v Abdulkadir, 2020 ABCA 214
...of the administration of justice must extend fairness to accused persons, but fairness is a two-way street”) & Pratt v. Nova Scotia, 2020 NSCA 39, ¶ 78 (“the procedural flaws [disposed of a habeus corpus application on the merits without hearing from the applicant] are dispositive of th......
-
Ping v. Canada (Attorney General),
...in mind that: · the original application filed September 16, 2020, was penned by Mr. Ping as a self-represented individual (see R v Pratt, 2020 NSCA 39 at paras. 56-7), and although it does not specifically plead any “deprivation of liberty” with respect to his placement on the RM protocol ......
-
Adams v. Nova Institution,
...potentially serious and damaging effects associated with solitary confinement (see, for example, Pratt v Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2020 NSCA 39 (“Pratt”), at paragraph 60; Wilcox v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 104 (“Wilcox”) at paragraphs 21 – 23 and 48 - 49; ......
-
Y v. Swinemar, 2020 NSSC 225
...must find authority for those policies in legislation or subordinate legislation (regulations)- Pratt v Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2020 NSCA 39 at para.91. On the other hand, in the Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018 ON......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
R v Abdulkadir, 2020 ABCA 214
...of the administration of justice must extend fairness to accused persons, but fairness is a two-way street”) & Pratt v. Nova Scotia, 2020 NSCA 39, ¶ 78 (“the procedural flaws [disposed of a habeus corpus application on the merits without hearing from the applicant] are dispositive of th......
-
Ping v. Canada (Attorney General),
...in mind that: · the original application filed September 16, 2020, was penned by Mr. Ping as a self-represented individual (see R v Pratt, 2020 NSCA 39 at paras. 56-7), and although it does not specifically plead any “deprivation of liberty” with respect to his placement on the RM protocol ......
-
Adams v. Nova Institution,
...potentially serious and damaging effects associated with solitary confinement (see, for example, Pratt v Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2020 NSCA 39 (“Pratt”), at paragraph 60; Wilcox v Alberta, 2020 ABCA 104 (“Wilcox”) at paragraphs 21 – 23 and 48 - 49; ......
-
Y v. Swinemar, 2020 NSSC 225
...must find authority for those policies in legislation or subordinate legislation (regulations)- Pratt v Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2020 NSCA 39 at para.91. On the other hand, in the Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018 ON......
Request a trial to view additional results