Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 864
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Bowden, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | INJUNCTIONS |
| Citation | [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 864,2010 BCSC 1206,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 864 (SC),2010 BCSC 864 |
| Date | 14 May 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
University of British Columbia v. Moscipan,
...order costs against the unsuccessful party: [17] In [Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe, 2010 BCSC 1206 (“Preferred Nutrition”)], the court held that costs on interlocutory applications should generally not be awarded at the inte......
-
Soby v. Soby, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1911 (SC)
...of awarding costs". Mr. Greene for the claimant argues instead that on the basis of Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe , 2010 BCSC 1206. In that case, Mr. Justice Bowden ordered that costs in the interlocutory proceedings should be in the cause. The basis for the Court's rul......
-
Wilson (Michael) & Partners Ltd. v. Desirée Resources Inc. et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2055 (SC)
...for security for costs, costs should be in the cause. I rely on the principle discussed in Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe , 2010 BCSC 1206 that costs should generally not be awarded at the interlocutory stage as the outcome of the litigation is not known and the party seeking cost......
-
Levere v. Moore,
...As a result, the offers made are not relevant. [15] In Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe, 2010 BCSC 1206, Bowden J. 11 Furthermore, case authorities referred to by the plaintiff indicate that costs should g......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
University of British Columbia v. Moscipan,
...order costs against the unsuccessful party: [17] In [Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe, 2010 BCSC 1206 (“Preferred Nutrition”)], the court held that costs on interlocutory applications should generally not be awarded at the inte......
-
Soby v. Soby, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1911 (SC)
...of awarding costs". Mr. Greene for the claimant argues instead that on the basis of Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe , 2010 BCSC 1206. In that case, Mr. Justice Bowden ordered that costs in the interlocutory proceedings should be in the cause. The basis for the Court's rul......
-
Wilson (Michael) & Partners Ltd. v. Desirée Resources Inc. et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2055 (SC)
...for security for costs, costs should be in the cause. I rely on the principle discussed in Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe , 2010 BCSC 1206 that costs should generally not be awarded at the interlocutory stage as the outcome of the litigation is not known and the party seeking cost......
-
Levere v. Moore,
...As a result, the offers made are not relevant. [15] In Preferred Nutrition Inc. v. Vanderhaeghe, 2010 BCSC 1206, Bowden J. 11 Furthermore, case authorities referred to by the plaintiff indicate that costs should g......
Request a trial to view additional results