Pu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 600
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 600 |
| Date | 08 June 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Zou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 368
...process. I find that the record and jurisprudence support the IAD’s conclusion (see, e.g., Pu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 600 at paras 17-19). [24] Mr. Zou also argues that the IAD essentially double counted the severity of his misconduct in 2005. He states that, while t......
-
Villanueva v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1634
...before the Federal Court with some frequency, such as one that I heard about 18 months ago in Pu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 600 at paras 18‑20: With respect to remorse, the IAD concluded that the Applicant’s remorse was not genuine principally because......
2 cases
-
Zou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 368
...process. I find that the record and jurisprudence support the IAD’s conclusion (see, e.g., Pu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 600 at paras 17-19). [24] Mr. Zou also argues that the IAD essentially double counted the severity of his misconduct in 2005. He states that, while t......
-
Villanueva v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1634
...before the Federal Court with some frequency, such as one that I heard about 18 months ago in Pu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 600 at paras 18‑20: With respect to remorse, the IAD concluded that the Applicant’s remorse was not genuine principally because......