Punit v. Punit, 2014 ONCA 252
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Juriansz, Pepall and van Rensburg, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | CONFLICT OF LAWS,PRACTICE,FAMILY LAW,COURTS |
| Citation | 2014 ONCA 252,[2014] O.A.C. Uned. 231 (CA),[2014] O.A.C. Uned. 231 |
| Date | 02 April 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 25 ' 29, 2021)
...for the respondent Keywords:Civil Procedure, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Partition Act, Partition Act, RSO 1990, c. P. 4, s. 7, Punit v Punit, 2014 ONCA 252 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be ought about your spec......
-
Civil Appeals in Ontario: How the Interlocutory/Final Distinction Became So Complicated and the Case for a Simple Solution.
...in its neutral citation that year. See 2016 ONCA 996. (88.) See Ambrose v Zuppardi, 2013 ONCA 768 at para 11. (89.) See Punit v Punit, 2014 ONCA 252 at para (90.) See Azzeh v Legendre, 2017 ONCA 385 at paras 22-26, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 37692 (8 February 2018). (91.) See e.g. Elli......
-
Latinovich v. Ferri,
...right to sale. She pointed to the need to consider any child’s best interest in allowing the sale, pointing to Punit v Punit, 2014 ONCA 252. There, the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered the effect of the sale on a teen-aged child, although it made little reference to them. 27.&#......
-
Dear v. Kennedy, 2019 ONSC 4302
...Act, the court should consider whether or not granting the order would cause undue prejudice to either party’s claims (Punit v. Punit 2014 ONCA 252 Court of [20] The respondent has had de facto exclusive possession of the matrimonial home since separation in 2013. The litigation has been be......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Latinovich v. Ferri,
...right to sale. She pointed to the need to consider any child’s best interest in allowing the sale, pointing to Punit v Punit, 2014 ONCA 252. There, the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered the effect of the sale on a teen-aged child, although it made little reference to them. 27.&#......
-
Dear v. Kennedy, 2019 ONSC 4302
...Act, the court should consider whether or not granting the order would cause undue prejudice to either party’s claims (Punit v. Punit 2014 ONCA 252 Court of [20] The respondent has had de facto exclusive possession of the matrimonial home since separation in 2013. The litigation has been be......
-
Carmichael v. Carmichael, 2019 ONSC 6313
...end there. This court is asked to make an order for the sale at an interim motion, prior to trial. [48] I have considered Punit v. Punit, 2014 ONCA 252, where the Ontario Court of Appeal considered the issue regarding sale of the matrimonial home. While discussing the merits, the court make......
-
McNamara v. Houston, 2017 ONSC 6443
...other accommodation prior to trial. Therefore, the court refused to make in order for sale.[27] The husband relies on Punit v. Punit, 2014 ONCA 252, at para 22, in which the court refused to order a sale prior to trial. The motion judge stated the trial would occur in the near future. The h......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 25 ' 29, 2021)
...for the respondent Keywords:Civil Procedure, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Partition Act, Partition Act, RSO 1990, c. P. 4, s. 7, Punit v Punit, 2014 ONCA 252 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be ought about your spec......
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Appeals in Ontario: How the Interlocutory/Final Distinction Became So Complicated and the Case for a Simple Solution.
...in its neutral citation that year. See 2016 ONCA 996. (88.) See Ambrose v Zuppardi, 2013 ONCA 768 at para 11. (89.) See Punit v Punit, 2014 ONCA 252 at para (90.) See Azzeh v Legendre, 2017 ONCA 385 at paras 22-26, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 37692 (8 February 2018). (91.) See e.g. Elli......