Purcaru v. Seliverstova et al., [2016] O.A.C. Uned. 506 (CA)

JudgeSharpe, Lauwers and Miller, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Case DateThursday August 04, 2016
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 506 (CA);2016 ONCA 610;[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 506
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 1, 2022
    ...L.15, s. 4,Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 137, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4.03 and 20.04, Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610, Outfront Media Canada LP v. Clarity Outdoor Media Inc., 2017 ONSC 2136, Anisman v. Drabinsky, 2020 ONSC 1197, aff'd 2021 ONCA 120, Grant Th......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 1, 2022
    ...L.15, s. 4,Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 137, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4.03 and 20.04, Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610, Outfront Media Canada LP v. Clarity Outdoor Media Inc., 2017 ONSC 2136, Anisman v. Drabinsky, 2020 ONSC 1197, aff'd 2021 ONCA 120, Grant Th......
  • Devry Smith Frank LLP v. Chopra, 2018 ONSC 1303
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 26, 2018
    ...348 (H.C.J.); Ferguson v. Lastewka, [1946] O.R. 577 (H.C.J.); Mulcahy v. Archibald (1898), 28 S.C.R. 523.[12] Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610; Business Development Bank of Canada v. Samarsky, 2012 ONSC 3002.[13] Montor Business Corp. (Trustee of) v. Goldfinger, 2016 ONCA 406, aff’g 2......
  • Midland Resources Holding Limited v. Bokserman, 2022 ONCA 73
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 28, 2022
    ...filed by the appellants. They say he ought to have ordered a trial. [11]       In Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610, 80 R.F.L. (7th) 28, at para. 5, this court held that a plaintiff challenging a transaction as fraudulent has the burden of proving “......
  • Get Started for Free
11 cases
  • Devry Smith Frank LLP v. Chopra, 2018 ONSC 1303
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 26, 2018
    ...348 (H.C.J.); Ferguson v. Lastewka, [1946] O.R. 577 (H.C.J.); Mulcahy v. Archibald (1898), 28 S.C.R. 523.[12] Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610; Business Development Bank of Canada v. Samarsky, 2012 ONSC 3002.[13] Montor Business Corp. (Trustee of) v. Goldfinger, 2016 ONCA 406, aff’g 2......
  • Midland Resources Holding Limited v. Bokserman, 2022 ONCA 73
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 28, 2022
    ...filed by the appellants. They say he ought to have ordered a trial. [11]       In Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610, 80 R.F.L. (7th) 28, at para. 5, this court held that a plaintiff challenging a transaction as fraudulent has the burden of proving “......
  • Ernst & Young Inc. v. Aquino, 2022 ONCA 202
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 10, 2022
    ...Below, at para. 145. [34] Decision Below, at para. 161, citing Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2015 ONSC 6679, 69 R.F.L. (7th) 388, aff’d 2016 ONCA 610, 80 R.F.L. (7th) 28. [35] Decision Below, at para. 164. [36] Decision Below, at para. 165. [37] Decision Below, at para. 193. [38] Decision......
  • Vohra v. Vohra,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...credibility absent “clear and palpable error”:  see Khamis v. Noormohamed, 2011 ONCA 127 and Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610.  That is inapplicable in the present case which is not an appeal of the arbitrator’s decision.  Similarly, in Luxterior De......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 1, 2022
    ...L.15, s. 4,Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 137, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4.03 and 20.04, Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610, Outfront Media Canada LP v. Clarity Outdoor Media Inc., 2017 ONSC 2136, Anisman v. Drabinsky, 2020 ONSC 1197, aff'd 2021 ONCA 120, Grant Th......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 1, 2022
    ...L.15, s. 4,Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 137, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 4.03 and 20.04, Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610, Outfront Media Canada LP v. Clarity Outdoor Media Inc., 2017 ONSC 2136, Anisman v. Drabinsky, 2020 ONSC 1197, aff'd 2021 ONCA 120, Grant Th......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 2-5, 2016)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 12, 2016
    ...as a credible witness and accepted her evidence. There is, therefore, no basis to interfere with the decision. Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2016 ONCA 610 [Sharpe, Lauwers and Miller Gary S. Joseph and Kenneth Younie, for the appellants Morris Cooper, for the respondent Keywords: Family Law, Fra......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT