Purdy v. Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Beveridge, Farrar and Bryson, JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2017 NSCA 84 |
| Docket Number | CA 453201 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Date | 28 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Muir v. Day,
...considering the factual matrix and surrounding circumstances of its execution (see Duncanson v. Webster, 2015 NSCA 29, Purdy v. Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84 and Penney v. Langille, 2018 NSCA 43). In the case at hand, the factual matrix and surrounding circumstances provide clear and sufficient evid......
-
Roy v. Cashen Estate, 2019 NSCA 62
...Cashen’s subjective intention is irrelevant (Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, ¶58; Purdy v. Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84, ¶16). Absent consideration of a “factual matrix”, interpretation of a deed is a question of law (Cook v. Podgorski, ......
-
Schnell v Stene (Heidinger Estate),
...them to deviate from the text such that the court effectively creates a new agreement” (paragraph 57 of Sattva). In Purdy v Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84 (“Purdy”), the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal added: “Surrounding circumstances assist the Court in interpreting the lang......
-
Penney v. Langille, 2018 NSCA 43
...principles applied by the judge are summarized by the respondents in their factum, quoting from the Court in Purdy v. Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84 at ¶ 15: [15] The law requires that a contract be “read . . . as a whole, giving the words used their ordinary and grammatical meaning, consistent with ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Muir v. Day,
...considering the factual matrix and surrounding circumstances of its execution (see Duncanson v. Webster, 2015 NSCA 29, Purdy v. Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84 and Penney v. Langille, 2018 NSCA 43). In the case at hand, the factual matrix and surrounding circumstances provide clear and sufficient evid......
-
Roy v. Cashen Estate, 2019 NSCA 62
...Cashen’s subjective intention is irrelevant (Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, ¶58; Purdy v. Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84, ¶16). Absent consideration of a “factual matrix”, interpretation of a deed is a question of law (Cook v. Podgorski, ......
-
Schnell v Stene (Heidinger Estate),
...them to deviate from the text such that the court effectively creates a new agreement” (paragraph 57 of Sattva). In Purdy v Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84 (“Purdy”), the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal added: “Surrounding circumstances assist the Court in interpreting the lang......
-
Penney v. Langille, 2018 NSCA 43
...principles applied by the judge are summarized by the respondents in their factum, quoting from the Court in Purdy v. Bishop, 2017 NSCA 84 at ¶ 15: [15] The law requires that a contract be “read . . . as a whole, giving the words used their ordinary and grammatical meaning, consistent with ......
Request a trial to view additional results