Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Qureshi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88

Document Cited authorities 14 Cited in 4 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 22, 2020
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2020 FC 88
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Nyabuzana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1484
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 31, 2021
    ...which the onus to submit sufficient evidence to warrant the exception is on the applicants (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at para 10; Kisana v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FCA 189 at para 45). On that note, the SCC in Kanthasamy underlined that &#x......
  • Khaja v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1041
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 13, 2022
    ...I agree that the appropriate standard of review for H&C decisions is reasonableness (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at paras 5-8; Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 (“Kanthasamy”) at paras 8, 44-45; Canada (Minister o......
  • Vincent v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1022
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 12, 2022
    ...I agree that the appropriate standard of review for H&C decisions is reasonableness (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at paras 5-8; Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 (“Kanthasamy”) at paras 8, 44-45; Canada (Minister o......
  • Helalifar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1040
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 13, 2022
    ...I agree that the appropriate standard of review for H&C decisions is reasonableness (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at paras 5-8; Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 (“Kanthasamy”) at paras 8, 44-45; Canada (Minister o......
4 cases
  • Nyabuzana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1484
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 31, 2021
    ...which the onus to submit sufficient evidence to warrant the exception is on the applicants (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at para 10; Kisana v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FCA 189 at para 45). On that note, the SCC in Kanthasamy underlined that &#x......
  • Khaja v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1041
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 13, 2022
    ...I agree that the appropriate standard of review for H&C decisions is reasonableness (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at paras 5-8; Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 (“Kanthasamy”) at paras 8, 44-45; Canada (Minister o......
  • Vincent v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1022
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 12, 2022
    ...I agree that the appropriate standard of review for H&C decisions is reasonableness (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at paras 5-8; Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 (“Kanthasamy”) at paras 8, 44-45; Canada (Minister o......
  • Helalifar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1040
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 13, 2022
    ...I agree that the appropriate standard of review for H&C decisions is reasonableness (Qureshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 88 at paras 5-8; Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 (“Kanthasamy”) at paras 8, 44-45; Canada (Minister o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT