R.C. v. Dr. Klukach, 2018 ONSC 7415

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePerell
Docket NumberCV-17-580985
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date11 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes - Fifth edition
    • June 28, 2022
    ...489 R.C. v. Klukach, 2018 ONSC 7415 .............................................................................................................. 58, 171 R.D. v. Eayrs, 2016 ONSC 2123 ................................................................................................................
  • Health Care Consent Act, 1996
    • Canada
    • Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes - Fifth edition
    • June 28, 2022
    ...the Board made its decision and to determine whether the Board’s decision is within the range of acceptable outcomes. R.C. v. Klukach , 2018 ONSC 7415 — The constitutional right to represent oneself — regardless of the fact that the accused would certainly not be an efective advocate — does......
  • Mental Health Act
    • Canada
    • Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes - Fifth edition
    • June 28, 2022
    ...to appoint amicus counsel is not clear). This requirement may be heightened when deciding capacity issues. CASELAW R.C. v. Klukach , 2018 ONSC 7415 — The court determined that the appellant, who chose to represent himself, did not receive a procedurally fair hearing. Where applicants make a......
  • Grey v LeBlanc,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 21, 2022
    ...in making its finings of fact or mixed fact and law do not extend beyond this case. [13]     In R.C. v. Klukach, 2018 ONSC 7415 (CanLII), Perell J. exercised his discretion to hear a moot appeal on a question of procedural fairness. But the issue in that case was not one......
1 cases
  • Grey v LeBlanc,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 21, 2022
    ...in making its finings of fact or mixed fact and law do not extend beyond this case. [13]     In R.C. v. Klukach, 2018 ONSC 7415 (CanLII), Perell J. exercised his discretion to hear a moot appeal on a question of procedural fairness. But the issue in that case was not one......
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes - Fifth edition
    • June 28, 2022
    ...489 R.C. v. Klukach, 2018 ONSC 7415 .............................................................................................................. 58, 171 R.D. v. Eayrs, 2016 ONSC 2123 ................................................................................................................
  • Health Care Consent Act, 1996
    • Canada
    • Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes - Fifth edition
    • June 28, 2022
    ...the Board made its decision and to determine whether the Board’s decision is within the range of acceptable outcomes. R.C. v. Klukach , 2018 ONSC 7415 — The constitutional right to represent oneself — regardless of the fact that the accused would certainly not be an efective advocate — does......
  • Mental Health Act
    • Canada
    • Annotated Ontario Mental Health Statutes - Fifth edition
    • June 28, 2022
    ...to appoint amicus counsel is not clear). This requirement may be heightened when deciding capacity issues. CASELAW R.C. v. Klukach , 2018 ONSC 7415 — The court determined that the appellant, who chose to represent himself, did not receive a procedurally fair hearing. Where applicants make a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT