R.L.G. v. R.G.G., 2006 BCSC 1299
| Judge | Silverman, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 17, 2006 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2006 BCSC 1299;[2006] B.C.T.C. 348 (SC);2006 BCSC 348 |
R.L.G. v. R.G.G., [2006] B.C.T.C. 348 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MR.079
R.L.G. (plaintiff) v. R.G.G. (defendant)
(E018084; 2006 BCSC 348; 2006 BCSC 1299)
Indexed As: R.L.G. v. R.G.G.
British Columbia Supreme Court
New Westminster
Silverman, J.
March 2, 2006 and August 24, 2006.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Family Law - Topic 868.2
Husband and wife - Marital property - Distribution orders - Debts (incl. contingent liabilities) - See paragraphs 40 to 55.
Family Law - Topic 875
Husband and wife - Marital property - Distribution orders - Statutes requiring equal division - Exceptions (incl. judicial reapportionment) - See paragraphs 58 to 81.
Family Law - Topic 4022
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - To wife - Considerations - See paragraphs 82 to 94, 124 to 127.
Practice - Topic 5006
Conduct of trial - General principles - Reopening of trial to hear additional submissions or evidence - See paragraphs 104 to 123.
Counsel:
Barry D. Bennett, for the plaintiff;
Carol W. Hickman, for the defendant.
This application was heard on January 17, 2006, before Silverman, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 2, 2006. Subsequently further submissions were heard on July 13, 2006, with supplementary reasons released on August 24, 2006.
Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Andreichikov v. Andreichikov, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 307
...a family asset where it finds the applicant spouse had been disadvantaged by the marriage and its breakdown: R.L.G. v. R.G.G. , 2006 BCSC 348; M.A.L. v. G.L. , 2005 BCSC 1198; Greene v Greene , 2008 BCSC 426. [95] The plaintiff argues the Steveston Highway Property should be treated like al......
-
McIntosh v. McIntosh, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 738 (SC)
...tendered the plaintiff to be the most helpful precedents in this rather complicated matter. [60] The first case is G.(R.L.) v. G. (R.G.) 2006 BCSC 348, a decision of Silverman J. In that case, the parties were married for 21 years and had three children. The oldest was in college, the middl......
-
Andreichikov v. Andreichikov, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 307
...a family asset where it finds the applicant spouse had been disadvantaged by the marriage and its breakdown: R.L.G. v. R.G.G. , 2006 BCSC 348; M.A.L. v. G.L. , 2005 BCSC 1198; Greene v Greene , 2008 BCSC 426. [95] The plaintiff argues the Steveston Highway Property should be treated like al......
-
McIntosh v. McIntosh, [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 738 (SC)
...tendered the plaintiff to be the most helpful precedents in this rather complicated matter. [60] The first case is G.(R.L.) v. G. (R.G.) 2006 BCSC 348, a decision of Silverman J. In that case, the parties were married for 21 years and had three children. The oldest was in college, the middl......