Chanel S. de R.L. et al. v. Lam Chan Kee Co. et al., 2015 FC 1091

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMartineau, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGE AWARDS,PRACTICE,INJUNCTIONS,TORTS
Citation2015 FC 1091,[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 586 (FC),[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 586
Date18 September 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • Chanel S. de R.L. et al. v. Lam Chan Kee Co. et al., 2016 FCA 111
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 6, 2016
    ...Gleason, J.A. : In this appeal the appellant seeks to set aside the September 18, 2015 decision of Justice Martineau of the Federal Court (2015 FC 1091) in which he conducted a summary trial, granted judgment in favour of the respondents, issued injunctive relief against three defendants, i......
  • Chanel S. de R.L. et al. v. Lam Chan Kee Co. et al., 2016 FC 987
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 30, 2016
    ...and Annie Pui Kwan Lam [Mrs. Lam], while their action against Mrs. Lam’s husband, Mr. Siu-Hung Lam, was dismissed: Chanel S de RL v Kee, 2015 FC 1091 [FC [3] Indeed, the Court accepted the plaintiffs’ uncontradicted evidence with respect to the following four instances, where counterfeit Ch......
  • Decision to not Remove Solicitors as Counsel for the Defendants Upheld on Appeal (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts - Week of February 27, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 1, 2017
    ...of the Federal Court's re-determination of a motion for summary trial (2016 FC 987, previously summarized here). In the original decision (2015 FC 1091, previously summarized here), the Federal Court awarded judgment against the Defendants for the infringement of several Chanel trademarks. ......
  • Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2022 FC 392
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 22, 2022
    ...(see Chanel S. de R.L. v. Lam Chan Kee Company Ltd., 2016 FC 987 at para 5, confirming the costs order in Chanel S. de R.L. v. Kee, 2015 FC 1091 at paras 26-27). [76] Similar costs in the amount of 66% were also recently confirmed in Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Ser......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Chanel S. de R.L. et al. v. Lam Chan Kee Co. et al., 2016 FCA 111
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 6, 2016
    ...Gleason, J.A. : In this appeal the appellant seeks to set aside the September 18, 2015 decision of Justice Martineau of the Federal Court (2015 FC 1091) in which he conducted a summary trial, granted judgment in favour of the respondents, issued injunctive relief against three defendants, i......
  • Chanel S. de R.L. et al. v. Lam Chan Kee Co. et al., 2016 FC 987
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 30, 2016
    ...and Annie Pui Kwan Lam [Mrs. Lam], while their action against Mrs. Lam’s husband, Mr. Siu-Hung Lam, was dismissed: Chanel S de RL v Kee, 2015 FC 1091 [FC [3] Indeed, the Court accepted the plaintiffs’ uncontradicted evidence with respect to the following four instances, where counterfeit Ch......
  • Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2022 FC 392
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 22, 2022
    ...(see Chanel S. de R.L. v. Lam Chan Kee Company Ltd., 2016 FC 987 at para 5, confirming the costs order in Chanel S. de R.L. v. Kee, 2015 FC 1091 at paras 26-27). [76] Similar costs in the amount of 66% were also recently confirmed in Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Ser......
  • Randy River Inc. v. Mint Accessories Inc., 2018 ONSC 1215
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 21, 2018
    ...defendants’ records of profits generated from their infringing activities are not before the court: Chanel S. de R.L. v. Lam Chan Kee Co., 2015 FC 1091 at paras. 21-22; Lam v. Chanel S. de R.L., 2016 FCA 11 at para. 17.[33] The Federal Court of Appeal has indicated that an award of nominal ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT