R v Abdulkadir, 2018 ABPC 244

JudgeM.G. Allen
Citation2018 ABPC 244
Date19 October 2018
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number170945612P1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R v Clark,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 17 Marzo 2022
    ...required a specific warning. He further relies on R v Tebo (2003), 172 OAC 148 (CA); R v Windle, 2017 ABQB 620; and R v Abdulkadir, 2018 ABPC 244, as illustrative of situations where in-court identification was described as problematic. [33]        In my v......
  • R v Badger, 2019 ABQB 551
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 22 Julio 2019
    ...simpliciter: R v Edmondson, 2005 SKCA 51 at para 68, leave to appeal ref’d, [2005] SCCA No 273, cited with approval in R v Abdulkadir, 2018 ABPC 244 at para 409. [26] Nonetheless, it is reasonable to conclude that the same conduct could, under certain circumstances, be prosecuted under eith......
  • R v Al Aazawi,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Mayo 2021
    ...The mens reas is found where the accused has one of the intents in subparagraphs a, b or c of section 279(1), R v Abdulkadir, 2018 ABPC 244, (“Abdulkadir”), Vu para Section 279(1)(b) [397]     Under section 279(1)(b) the Crown must prove the accused took th......
  • 2023 ABCJ 87,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...(This reasoning was later upheld by the Court of Appeal in the R v AK 2005 ABCA 166.) 14 The more recent case of R v Abdulkadir 2018 ABPC 244 considers the presumption of mechanical regularity as it is discussed in numerous cases from multiple jurisdictions, including Alberta, British Colum......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R v Clark,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 17 Marzo 2022
    ...required a specific warning. He further relies on R v Tebo (2003), 172 OAC 148 (CA); R v Windle, 2017 ABQB 620; and R v Abdulkadir, 2018 ABPC 244, as illustrative of situations where in-court identification was described as problematic. [33]        In my v......
  • R v Badger, 2019 ABQB 551
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 22 Julio 2019
    ...simpliciter: R v Edmondson, 2005 SKCA 51 at para 68, leave to appeal ref’d, [2005] SCCA No 273, cited with approval in R v Abdulkadir, 2018 ABPC 244 at para 409. [26] Nonetheless, it is reasonable to conclude that the same conduct could, under certain circumstances, be prosecuted under eith......
  • R v Al Aazawi,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Mayo 2021
    ...The mens reas is found where the accused has one of the intents in subparagraphs a, b or c of section 279(1), R v Abdulkadir, 2018 ABPC 244, (“Abdulkadir”), Vu para Section 279(1)(b) [397]     Under section 279(1)(b) the Crown must prove the accused took th......
  • 2023 ABCJ 87,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...(This reasoning was later upheld by the Court of Appeal in the R v AK 2005 ABCA 166.) 14 The more recent case of R v Abdulkadir 2018 ABPC 244 considers the presumption of mechanical regularity as it is discussed in numerous cases from multiple jurisdictions, including Alberta, British Colum......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT