R. v. Acosta, 2021 NSSC 343
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Honourable Justice James L. Chipman |
| Citation | 2021 NSSC 343 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Date | 16 December 2021 |
| Docket Number | CRH No.: 504091 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. M (CJP),
...of guilt drawn from circumstantial evidence should be the only reasonable inference that such evidence permits. In R. v. Acosta, 2021 NSSC 343, I canvassed R. v. Villaroman and recent treatment of circumstantial evidence at the Ontario Court of Appeal (R. v. Ali, 2021 ONCA 362) and ou......
-
R. v. Baker,
...of guilt drawn from circumstantial evidence should be the only reasonable inference that such evidence permits. In R. v. Acosta, 2021 NSSC 343, I canvassed R. v. Villaroman and recent treatment of circumstantial evidence at the Ontario Court of Appeal (R. v. Ali, 2021 ONCA 362) and ou......
2 cases
-
R. v. M (CJP),
...of guilt drawn from circumstantial evidence should be the only reasonable inference that such evidence permits. In R. v. Acosta, 2021 NSSC 343, I canvassed R. v. Villaroman and recent treatment of circumstantial evidence at the Ontario Court of Appeal (R. v. Ali, 2021 ONCA 362) and ou......
-
R. v. Baker,
...of guilt drawn from circumstantial evidence should be the only reasonable inference that such evidence permits. In R. v. Acosta, 2021 NSSC 343, I canvassed R. v. Villaroman and recent treatment of circumstantial evidence at the Ontario Court of Appeal (R. v. Ali, 2021 ONCA 362) and ou......