R. v. Adam (W.A.) et al., [2006] B.C.T.C. 382 (SC)
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 09, 2006 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2006] B.C.T.C. 382 (SC);2006 BCSC 382 |
R. v. Adam (W.A.), [2006] B.C.T.C. 382 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.007
Regina v. Wade Alex Adam, Sean William Doak, Robert Vaughn Hamm, Bryon John Newberry, Shane Jason Schindler, Thomas William Westle and Trevor Lee Ernest Zacharuk (accused)
(X067362; 2006 BCSC 382)
Indexed As: R. v. Adam (W.A.) et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
New Westminster
Romilly, J.
March 9, 2006.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Civil Rights - Topic 1373
Security of the person - Police surveillance - Interception of private communications - See paragraphs 35 to 42.
Criminal Law - Topic 5244.1
Evidence and witnesses - Identification - Voice identification - See paragraphs 79 to 91.
Criminal Law - Topic 5274.4
Evidence and witnesses - Interception of private communications (incl. video surveillance) - Application for - Investigative necessity - See paragraphs 116 to 160.
Criminal Law - Topic 5274.5
Evidence and witnesses - Interception of private communications (incl. video surveillance) - Application for - Evidence in support - See paragraphs 1 to 162.
Criminal Law - Topic 5283.3
Evidence and witnesses - Interception of private communications (incl. video surveillance) - Authority for - Judicial review - Evidence - See paragraphs 20 to 34.
Counsel:
Clyde Bond, Mandana Namazi and Leslie LeClair, for the Crown;
John Conroy, Q.C., for the accused, Wade Alex Adam and Sean William Doak;
Darcy P. Lawrence, for the accused, Robert Vaughn Hamm;
Alexander Murray, for the accused, Bryon John Newberry;
Robert Gunnell, for the accused, Thomas William Westle;
Kenneth R. Beatch, for the accused, Trevor Lee Ernest Zacharuk.
This application was heard on January 25-27, 30 and 31, 2006, before Romilly, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 9, 2006.
Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R v Elson, 2019 ABPC 27
...380; R v Clow, 2012 ABQB 656; R v Saunders, 2003 NLCA 63; R v Pires; R v Lising, 2005 SCC 66; R v McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365; and R v Adam, 2006 BCSC 382. [135] Defence Counsel has referred the Court to the following authorities: R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32; R v Pires;R v Li......
-
R. v. Adam (W.A.) et al., 2006 BCSC 1884
...Authorization, P.1/2000) , 2006 BCSC 200 and R. v. Adam (Validity of Authorization, P. 1/2001, P.17 / 2001, P.21 / 2001, P.35 /2001) , 2006 BCSC 382. [4] In the course of the trial, various officers who had taken part in the police investigation were called to identify voices on the inter......
-
R. v. Serré (D.), [2011] O.T.C. Uned. 3944 (SC)
...requirements of authorization, without being unnecessarily detailed or tangential ( R. v. Villa , [1988] O.J. No. 10 (H.C.); R. v. Adam , 2006 BCSC 382, [2006] B.C.J. No. 536 at para 48 [ Adam ]). After reading the July ITO and hearing the evidence of Ste-Marie as to the efforts he took in ......
-
R. v. Fraser (T.D.) et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 344 (SC)
...or gather sufficient evidence to prosecute all the individuals involved." [67] Reference was also made during argument to R. v. Adam , 2006 BCSC 382. In that case, Romilly, J., addressed a litany of arguments advanced in support of quashing an authorization. In that case, the police were us......
-
R v Elson, 2019 ABPC 27
...380; R v Clow, 2012 ABQB 656; R v Saunders, 2003 NLCA 63; R v Pires; R v Lising, 2005 SCC 66; R v McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365; and R v Adam, 2006 BCSC 382. [135] Defence Counsel has referred the Court to the following authorities: R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32; R v Pires;R v Li......
-
R. v. Adam (W.A.) et al., 2006 BCSC 1884
...Authorization, P.1/2000) , 2006 BCSC 200 and R. v. Adam (Validity of Authorization, P. 1/2001, P.17 / 2001, P.21 / 2001, P.35 /2001) , 2006 BCSC 382. [4] In the course of the trial, various officers who had taken part in the police investigation were called to identify voices on the inter......
-
R. v. Serré (D.), [2011] O.T.C. Uned. 3944 (SC)
...requirements of authorization, without being unnecessarily detailed or tangential ( R. v. Villa , [1988] O.J. No. 10 (H.C.); R. v. Adam , 2006 BCSC 382, [2006] B.C.J. No. 536 at para 48 [ Adam ]). After reading the July ITO and hearing the evidence of Ste-Marie as to the efforts he took in ......
-
R. v. Fraser (T.D.) et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 344 (SC)
...or gather sufficient evidence to prosecute all the individuals involved." [67] Reference was also made during argument to R. v. Adam , 2006 BCSC 382. In that case, Romilly, J., addressed a litany of arguments advanced in support of quashing an authorization. In that case, the police were us......