R. v. Agnihotri, 2019 ONCJ 551
| Judge | Justice M.M. Rahman |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 31, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | 2019 ONCJ 551 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Pillar, 2020 ONCJ 394
...by the application of s. 24(2). [78] There are other decisions of this court which go both ways on this issue. [79] In R. v. Agnihotri, 2019 ONCJ 551, Rahman J. held that Mawad was correctly decided and that the second use of the phrase “as soon as practicable” in s. 254(3) meant only that ......
-
R. v. Azeredo, 2019 ONCJ 615
...title="" id="_ftn2">[2] See R. v. Francey, 2018 ONCJ 657 for a thorough discussion of the two lines of authority. [3] R. v. Agnihotri, 2019 ONCJ 551 at paras. 17 to [4] Indeed, that is implicit in the applicant’s argument that the second call was unnecessary. [5]rom clear that the DRE must ......
2 cases
-
R. v. Pillar, 2020 ONCJ 394
...by the application of s. 24(2). [78] There are other decisions of this court which go both ways on this issue. [79] In R. v. Agnihotri, 2019 ONCJ 551, Rahman J. held that Mawad was correctly decided and that the second use of the phrase “as soon as practicable” in s. 254(3) meant only that ......
-
R. v. Azeredo, 2019 ONCJ 615
...title="" id="_ftn2">[2] See R. v. Francey, 2018 ONCJ 657 for a thorough discussion of the two lines of authority. [3] R. v. Agnihotri, 2019 ONCJ 551 at paras. 17 to [4] Indeed, that is implicit in the applicant’s argument that the second call was unnecessary. [5]rom clear that the DRE must ......