R v Ahmed

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeJohn T. Henderson
Citation2019 ABQB 13
Docket Number180631343S1
Date11 January 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Alberta (Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement) v DCR
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 January 2019
    ...v Sykes, 2011 ABCA 191, Ritter JA at para 9; Geophysical Service Incorporated v EnCana Corporation, 2017 ABCA 125 at para 75; R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13, Henderson J at para IV. What background issues must be considered? [26] Before turning to the issues arising from the application Judge’s de......
  • Distracted Driving and the Traffic Safety Act.
    • Canada
    • LawNow Vol. 44 No. 1, September 2019
    • 1 September 2019
    ...considered the distracted driving provisions relating to mobile devices in Alberta's Traffic Safety Act. Case Commented On: R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13 Alberta added distracted driving offences to the Traffic Safety Act, RSA 2000 c T-6 in 2011, and two of these provisions are the subject of thi......
  • Case Summary: R v Ahmed
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 March 2019
    ...cell and smart phones in the definition of “hand held electronic” and “wireless electronic” devices in the Traffic Safety Act. R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13, per Henderson, J. FACTS AND ISSUES: The Respondent Ahmed, was holding a cell phone in his hand while operating a motor vehicle. He would al......
  • Defence + Indemnity - February 2019: Case Summary: R v Ahmed
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • 7 March 2019
    ...cell and smart phones in the definition of “hand held electronic” and “wireless electronic” devices in the Traffic Safety Act. R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13, per Henderson, J. FACTS AND ISSUES: The Respondent Ahmed, was holding a cell phone in his hand while operating a motor vehicle. He would al......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Alberta (Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement) v DCR
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 January 2019
    ...v Sykes, 2011 ABCA 191, Ritter JA at para 9; Geophysical Service Incorporated v EnCana Corporation, 2017 ABCA 125 at para 75; R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13, Henderson J at para IV. What background issues must be considered? [26] Before turning to the issues arising from the application Judge’s de......
  • LUKIC v. R.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 16 August 2021
    ...requiring continued observation of the driver for that period of time if the prohibition is to be effective. [58] Similarly, in R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13, 84 Alta LR (6th) 187, Henderson J. identified the purpose of Alberta’s distracted driving provisions. At paras. 44 to 46, Henderson J. 44 ......
  • R v Gagne
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 23 July 2019
    ...of Alberta’s distracted driving laws were recently canvassed by Justice Henderson of the Court of Queen’s Bench in the case of R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13 (Ahmed). Justice Henderson writes that, generally speaking, the Traffic Safety Act exists to: “provide protection for and to enhance the saf......
  • R v Smith
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 2 November 2022
    ...are aimed at reducing personal injury and property damage caused by distracted drivers, including the use of a cell phone (see R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13 [Ahmed] at para 46).  Justice Henderson found in Ahmed at para 47 that the distracted driving legislation was intended to be “comprehen......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Case Summary: R v Ahmed
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 11 March 2019
    ...cell and smart phones in the definition of “hand held electronic” and “wireless electronic” devices in the Traffic Safety Act. R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13, per Henderson, J. FACTS AND ISSUES: The Respondent Ahmed, was holding a cell phone in his hand while operating a motor vehicle. He would al......
  • Defence + Indemnity - February 2019: Case Summary: R v Ahmed
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • 7 March 2019
    ...cell and smart phones in the definition of “hand held electronic” and “wireless electronic” devices in the Traffic Safety Act. R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13, per Henderson, J. FACTS AND ISSUES: The Respondent Ahmed, was holding a cell phone in his hand while operating a motor vehicle. He would al......
1 books & journal articles
  • Distracted Driving and the Traffic Safety Act.
    • Canada
    • LawNow Vol. 44 No. 1, September 2019
    • 1 September 2019
    ...considered the distracted driving provisions relating to mobile devices in Alberta's Traffic Safety Act. Case Commented On: R v Ahmed, 2019 ABQB 13 Alberta added distracted driving offences to the Traffic Safety Act, RSA 2000 c T-6 in 2011, and two of these provisions are the subject of thi......