R. v. Amey (B.), (2009) 278 N.S.R.(2d) 97 (PC)
| Judge | Ross, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 31, 2009 |
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Citations | (2009), 278 N.S.R.(2d) 97 (PC);2009 NSPC 29 |
R. v. Amey (B.) (2009), 278 N.S.R.(2d) 97 (PC);
886 A.P.R. 97
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2009] N.S.R.(2d) TBEd. JN.056
Her Majesty The Queen v. Bernard Amey
(1730266/267/268, 1808345-347, 1730861, 1860967, 1857462-464, 1860964, 1864360, 1862143-145, 1867829; 2009 NSPC 29)
Indexed As: R. v. Amey (B.)
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Ross, P.C.J.
April 14, 2009.
Summary:
A court-ordered medical assessment determined, in March 2008, that the accused was unfit to stand trial because of memory problems resulting from alcohol induced dementia (Dr. Konfli). Months later, the accused's counsel sought a second opinion. Another psychiatrist (Dr. Aquino) determined that improvements in the accused's condition made him now fit to stand trial. A staff psychiatrist at the East Coast Forensic Hospital (Dr. Brunet) disagreed. Both Dr. Aquino (fit) and Drs. Brunet and Konfli (unfit) appeared before the Review Board, which found the accused fit to stand trial. The matter of the accused's fitness to stand trial came again before the Provincial Court for a de novo hearing.
The Nova Scotia Provincial Court held that the 73 year old accused remained unfit to stand trial.
Criminal Law - Topic 92.3
General principles - Mental disorder - General - Preliminary trial of issue of fitness - In March 2008, the accused was found unfit to stand trial because of memory problems resulting from alcohol induced dementia - Months later, the accused's counsel sought a second opinion - Another psychiatrist determined that improvements in the accused's condition made him now fit to stand trial - Two other psychiatrists disagreed - The Review Board found the accused fit to stand trial - The Nova Scotia Provincial Court determined that the 73 year old accused remained unfit to stand trial - While the accused generally understood the functions of a judge, counsel, etc., and appreciated that conviction had consequences, he remained unable to communicate with counsel in a meaningful way due to short and long term memory impairment - The accused did not possess the ability to relate trial testimony to past events and to assess, at least on a rudimentary level, the possible veracity of such evidence - The accused's mental illness not only compromised his memory of the underlying events, but deprived him of the ability to process and remember things that would happen during his trial - He was unable to retain and process, even at a basic level, what he might be told of these events by other witnesses - The court stated that if the accused were put on trial "he would be incapable of understanding the basis for an outcome which was contrary to his interests or beliefs, even though he may 'understand the possible consequences' in terms of punishment".
Criminal Law - Topic 109
General principles - Mental disorder - Insanity, automatism, etc. - Insanity - Preliminary issue respecting the ability of the accused to conduct his defence - [See Criminal Law - Topic 92.3 ].
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Bain (E.L.) (1994), 130 N.S.R.(2d) 332; 367 A.P.R. 332 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].
R. v. Taylor (D.R.M.) (1992), 59 O.A.C. 43; 77 C.C.C.(3d) 551 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].
R. v. Morrissey (P.) (2007), 230 O.A.C. 141; 54 C.R.(6th) 313 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].
R. v. Gorecki (No. 1) (1976), 14 O.R.(2d) 212 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 68].
Pritchard, Re (1836), 7 C. & P.R. 303, refd to. [para. 71].
Counsel:
Darcy MacPherson, for the Crown;
Ann Marie MacInnes, for the accused.
This matter was heard on March 31, 2009, at Sydney, N.S., before Ross, P.C.J., of the Nova Scotia Provincial Court, whose following oral decision of April 14, 2009, was filed in writing on April 27, 2009.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R. v. Eisnor (W.P.), (2015) 362 N.S.R.(2d) 157 (CA)
...18 et seq]. R. v. Jobb (C.V.) (2008), 314 Sask.R. 236 ; 435 W.A.C. 236 ; 2008 SKCA 156 , refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Amey (B.) (2009), 278 N.S.R.(2d) 97; 886 A.P.R. 97 ; 2009 NSPC 29 , refd to. [paras. 18, 136 et R. v. Adam (R.), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 373 ; 2013 ONSC 373 , refd to. [par......
-
Table of Cases
...42, 197 R v Adam , [2013] OJ No 222 (SCJ) ................................................ 20, 24, 26, 28, 76, 77, 200 R v Amey, 2009 NSPC 29 .........................................................................................71, 200 R v Antoine, [2000] 2 All ER 208 (HL) ....................
-
Appendices A. Canadian, British, and American Case Summaries
...an accused person in a criminal trial, meaningful participation can only mean the ability to defend oneself ” (at para 29). R v Amey , 2009 NSPC 29 An accused’s inability to remember the events leading to the charge as well as an inability to remember the course of the trial led to a inding......
-
Psychiatric Aspects of Fitness
...in Forensic Patients” (2004) 27:3 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 215. 14 R v Morrissey , above note 9. 15 Compare R v Amey , 2009 NSPC 29 at para 62, where the court found that an inability to remember the events leading to the charge as well as an inability to remember the cou......
-
R. v. Eisnor (W.P.), (2015) 362 N.S.R.(2d) 157 (CA)
...18 et seq]. R. v. Jobb (C.V.) (2008), 314 Sask.R. 236 ; 435 W.A.C. 236 ; 2008 SKCA 156 , refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Amey (B.) (2009), 278 N.S.R.(2d) 97; 886 A.P.R. 97 ; 2009 NSPC 29 , refd to. [paras. 18, 136 et R. v. Adam (R.), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 373 ; 2013 ONSC 373 , refd to. [par......
-
R. v. Kampos, 2020 BCSC 1437
...(3d) 551 (Ont. C.A.) [Taylor]: R. v. Iverson, 2014 BCSC 627; R. v. Adam, 2013 ONSC 373 [Adam]; R. v. Klein, 2018 BCSC 678 and R. v. Amey, 2009 NSPC 29. [5] The Crown takes a neutral position but does acknowledge that Mr. Kampos’s continuing delusional beliefs could impact his ability to com......
-
R. v. Daley, 2019 NBCA 89
...natural ability in his full answer and defence to the charge against him. [paras. 11-14; citations omitted] [29] Further, in R. v. Amey, 2009 NSPC 29, [2009] N.S.J. No. 279 (QL), the court had to determine whether an accused who was diagnosed with dementia and substance abuse with accompany......
-
R. v. Kampos,
...for fitness set out in R. v. Taylor (1992), 77 C.C.C. (3d) 551 (Ont. C.A.) [Taylor], including R. v. Daley, 2019 NBCA 89 and R. v. Amey, 2009 NSPC 29. [5] The Crown takes a neutral position but agrees that Mr. Kampos......
-
Table of Cases
...42, 197 R v Adam , [2013] OJ No 222 (SCJ) ................................................ 20, 24, 26, 28, 76, 77, 200 R v Amey, 2009 NSPC 29 .........................................................................................71, 200 R v Antoine, [2000] 2 All ER 208 (HL) ....................
-
Appendices A. Canadian, British, and American Case Summaries
...an accused person in a criminal trial, meaningful participation can only mean the ability to defend oneself ” (at para 29). R v Amey , 2009 NSPC 29 An accused’s inability to remember the events leading to the charge as well as an inability to remember the course of the trial led to a inding......
-
Psychiatric Aspects of Fitness
...in Forensic Patients” (2004) 27:3 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 215. 14 R v Morrissey , above note 9. 15 Compare R v Amey , 2009 NSPC 29 at para 62, where the court found that an inability to remember the events leading to the charge as well as an inability to remember the cou......