R. v. Andersen (P.), [2011] Sask.R. Uned. 211

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeChicoine, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW
Citation[2011] Sask.R. Uned. 211,[2011] Sask.R. Uned. 211 (QB),2011 SKQB 92
Date25 February 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Andersen (P.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 25, 2012
    ...as the summary conviction appeal court, and the judge who heard his appeal quashed the conviction and entered an acquittal (see 2011 SKQB 92). II. Leave Application [3] Under s. 839 of the Criminal Code , the Crown may seek leave to appeal a decision of a summary conviction appeal court on ......
  • R. v. Todoschuk (E.J.), 2012 SKPC 191
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 20, 2012
    ...2003 SKCA 22, refd to. [para. 9, footnote 2]. R. v. Andersen (P.) (2009), 335 Sask.R. 100; 2009 SKPC 69, revd. [2011] Sask.R. Uned. 211; 2011 SKQB 92, revd. (2012), 399 Sask.R. 1; 552 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SKCA 37, refd to. [para. 9, footnote R. v. Buckingham (R.A.) (2007), 293 Sask.R. 42; 397 W.A......
2 cases
  • R. v. Andersen (P.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 25, 2012
    ...as the summary conviction appeal court, and the judge who heard his appeal quashed the conviction and entered an acquittal (see 2011 SKQB 92). II. Leave Application [3] Under s. 839 of the Criminal Code , the Crown may seek leave to appeal a decision of a summary conviction appeal court on ......
  • R. v. Todoschuk (E.J.), 2012 SKPC 191
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 20, 2012
    ...2003 SKCA 22, refd to. [para. 9, footnote 2]. R. v. Andersen (P.) (2009), 335 Sask.R. 100; 2009 SKPC 69, revd. [2011] Sask.R. Uned. 211; 2011 SKQB 92, revd. (2012), 399 Sask.R. 1; 552 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SKCA 37, refd to. [para. 9, footnote R. v. Buckingham (R.A.) (2007), 293 Sask.R. 42; 397 W.A......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT